The Typologies of Islamic Thought: Mapping The Contemporary Intellectual Movements in Indonesia

Faizal Amin*    -  (Scopus ID 57222711845) Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pontianak, Pontianak, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
The continuity and change of reformation ideas in the history of the Islamic intellectual movement necessitate a systematic categorization. This article endeavors to present a fresh framework for classifying Islamic thought, drawing inspiration from Fazlur Rahman’s categories of revivalist, classical modernist, neo-revivalist, and neo-modernist. More specifically, this article  examines a reclassification of Islamic thought and elaborates on its implications for the contemporary historical narrative of the Islamic intellectual movement within the Indonesian context. By undertaking a comprehensive literature review and employing a descriptive methodology for data collection and analysis, this article found out eight categories or typologies characterizing contemporary Islamic intellectual movements in Indonesia: (1) the revivalist movement, (2) the classical modernist movement, (3) the neo-revivalist movement, (4) the neo-modernist movement, (5) the traditionalist movement, (6) the neo-traditionalist movement, (7) the post-modernist movement, and (8) the post-traditionalist movement. These typologies commence with the emergence of classical modernism juxtaposed against classical traditionalism as the turning point of the dialectical progression of Indonesian Islamic intellectualism. Each typology has undergone a transformative process and metamorphosis within a dynamic scientific dialectic.

Keywords: reformation ideas; categorization framework; Islamic thought; intellectual movements.

  1. Ali, Fachry, dan Bahtiar Effendy. Merambah Jalan Baru Islam: Rekonstruksi Pemikiran Islam Indonesia Masa Orde Baru. Bandung: Mizan, 1990.
  2. Aziz, A Fahrizal. “JIMM, dalam Perbincangan Ummat.†Koran Online. Kompasiana (blog), 17 Juni 2015. http://www.kompasiana.com/fahrizhal/jimm-dalam-perbincangan-ummat_555f11abe1afbdbb198b4588.
  3. Azra, Azyumardi. “Intelektual Muslim Baru dan Kajian Islam.†Studia Islamika: Indonesian Journal for Islamic Studies 19, no. 1 (2012): 191–202.
  4. ———. “Kajian Islam CUHK-1.†republika.co.id, Kamis, Oktober 2014, bag. Berita Kolom Resonansi.
  5. ———. Modernism Islam dan Perkembangan Intelektualisme Islam. Contemporary Islamic World. SPs UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2016.
  6. Baso, Ahmad. Islam Pasca Kolonial: Perselingkuhan Reformisme Agama, Kolonialisme dan Liberalisme. Edisi Revisi. Tangerang Selatan: Pustaka Afid, 2016.
  7. Dhofier, Zamakhsyari. Tradisi Pesantren, Studi Perbandingan Hidup Kyai dan Visinya Mengenai Masa Depan Indonesia (Edisi Revisi). Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: LP3ES, 2011.
  8. Hardiman, Fransisco Budi. Melampaui Positivisme dan Modernitas: Diskursus Filosofis tentang Metode Ilmiah dan Problem Modernitas. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2003.
  9. Jamil, M. Mukhsin, Musahadi Mushadi, Choirul Anwar, dan Abdul Kholiq. Nalar Islam Nusantara: Studi Islam ala Muhammadiyah, al-Irsyad, Persis, dan NU. Disunting oleh Ali Romdhoni. Jakarta: Dirjen Pendidikan Islam Kemenag RI, 2007.
  10. Kersten, Carool. A History of Islam in Indonesia: Unity in Diversity. The New Edinburgh Islamic Surveys. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.
  11. Kersten, Carool. Cosmopolitans and Heretics: New Muslim Intellectuals and the Study of Islam. London: Hurst & Company, 2011.
  12. Kurnia, Nia, dan Amelia Fauzia. “Gerakan Modernisme.†Dalam Eksiklopedi Tematis Dunia Islam, disunting oleh Taufik Abdullah dan dkk. Asia Tenggara 5. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru van Hoeve, 2003.
  13. Lapidus, Ira M. Sejarah Sosial Ummat Islam : Bagian ke-Satu dan ke-Dua. Diterjemahkan oleh Ghufran A. Mas’adi. I. A History of Islamic Societies. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 1999.
  14. Noer, Deliar. Gerakan Modern Islam di Indonesia 1900-1942. Jakarta: LP3ES, 1996.
  15. Piliang, Yasraf Amir. “Posmodernisme dan Hipermodernitas: Hibriditas Tanda dan Matinya Realitas.†Linguistika Kultura 8, no. 3 (Maret 2013): 1–10.
  16. Rabasa, Angel M., Cheryl Benard, Peter Chalk, C. Christine Fair, Theodore Karasik, Rollie Lal, Ian Leseer, dan David Thaler. The Muslim World After 9/11. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2004. http://www.rand.org/.
  17. Rahman, Fazlur. Neo-Modernisme Islam: Metode dan Alternatif. Disunting oleh Taufik Adnan Amal. 9 ed. Bandung: Mizan, 1989.
  18. Riyadi, Ahmad Ali. “Gerakan Pembaharuan Islam Kaum Muda Nahdlatul Ulama.†Jurnal Hermeneia 4, no. 1 (2005): 1–15.
  19. Rumadi. Post Tradisionalisme Islam: Wacana Intelektualisme dalam Komunitas NU. Disunting oleh Marzuki Wahid. Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Tinggi Islam Depag RI, t.t.
  20. Testriono. “Is Indonesian Islam Different? Islam in Indonesia in a Comparative International Perspective.†Studia Islamika: Indonesian Journal for Islamic Studies 18, no. 1 (2011): 199–202.
  21. Woodward, Mark. “Indonesia, Islam dan Orientalisme: Sebuah Wacana Yang Melintas.†Dalam Jalan Baru Islam: Memetakan Paradigma Mutakhir Islam Indonesia, disunting oleh Mark Woodward, 1 ed. Bandung: Mizan, 1998.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Theologia
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 

JURNAL THEOLOGIA

Published by The Faculty of Islamic Theology and Humanities
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo
Semarang - Indonesia

 
                                                               
Web
Analytics
View My Stats
apps