Analisis Kesesuaian Kompetensi Dasar dengan Bahan Ajar Bahasa Arab MTs Kelas IX Karya Yushi M. Mahmudah

Ali Mufti*  -  Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Mudrofin Mudrofin    -  SMA Islam An-Nidhom Demak, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/alsina.3.1.10432

The Indonesian Ministry of Religion has published Arabic textbooks for ninth grade to assist the implementation of the revision of the Core and Basic Competencies. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the compatibility of Arabic teaching materials with the Basic Competencies outlined in KMA No. 183 of 2019. The study employs a library research design with the data collected using documentation. The sample was selected using purposive sampling techniques, namely the content examination and assessment. Content analysis was performed to analyze the data. The results showed that some contents of the textbook did not comply with the requirements of the basic competence. Several readings and conversational texts did not instance of grammatical structures in use. The textbook did not contain practice questions for mahrah istima'. Also, only 13 (out of 34) questions in the mahÄÂrah istimÄÂ' segment pertain to higher-order thinking skills (HOTS), while the majority of the questions in mahÄÂrah kalÄÂm and kitÄÂbah pertains to the basic competence of 2013 Curriculum.

Keywords: Analysis of Teaching Materials; Content Analysis; Basic Competencies; Curriculum 2013

  1. Ahqaf, Muhammad Infithar Al. “Analisis Kelayakan Bahan Ajar Bahasa Arab Untuk Madrasah Tsanawiyah.†Jurnal Al-Maqayis 6, no. 2 (2019): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.18592/JAMS.V6I2.5450.
  2. Ainin, Moh. “Penilaian Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab di Madrasah atau Sekolah: HOTS, MOTS atau LOTS?†In Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Bahasa Arab (KONASBARA), 155–65. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang, 2018. http://prosiding.arab-um.com/index.php/konasbara/article/view/266.
  3. Albantani, Azkia Muharom. “Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah.†Arabiyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban 2, no. 2 (December 2015): 178–91. https://doi.org/10.15408/a.v2i2.2127.
  4. Anderson, Lorin W., David R. Krathwohl, Peter W. Airasian, Kathleen A. Cruikshank, Richard E. Mayer, Paul R. Pintrich, James Raths, and Merlin C. Wittrock. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman, 2001.
  5. Azhari, Afifa Wijdan. “Analisis Buku Ajar Bahasa Arab Kelas VI Madrasah Ibtidaiah Terbitan Karya Toha Putra.†ALSUNIYAT: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya Arab 1, no. 2 (2018): 125–36. https://doi.org/10.17509/alsuniyat.v1i2.24360.
  6. Di, Wu, Xing Danxia, and Lu Chun. “The Effects of Learner Factors on Higher-Order Thinking in the Smart Classroom Environment.†Journal of Computers in Education 6, no. 4 (2019): 483–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00146-4.
  7. Faoziyah, Laila. “Analisis Buku Ajar Bahasa Arab Madrasah Aliyah Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013.†Institut Agama Islam Negeri Purwokerto, 2020.
  8. Ghanizadeh, Afsaneh, Ali H. Al-Hoorie, and Safoura Jahedizadeh. “Higher Order Thinking Skills.†In Higher Order Thinking Skills in the Language Classroom: A Concise Guide, edited by Afsaneh Ghanizadeh, Ali H. Al-Hoorie, and Safoura Jahedizadeh, 1–51. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Cham: Springer, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56711-8_1.
  9. Kementerian Agama. Keputusan Menteri Agama Tentang Kurikulum PAI dan Bahasa Arab pada Madrasah, Pub. L. No. 183, 1 (2019).
  10. ———. Keputusan Menteri Agama tentang Pedoman Implementasi Kurikulum pada Madrasah, Pub. L. No. 184 (2019).
  11. Kwangmuang, Parama, Suwisa Jarutkamolpong, Watcharee Sangboonraung, and Srisuda Daungtod. “The Development of Learning Innovation to Enhance Higher Order Thinking Skills for Students in Thailand Junior High Schools.†Heliyon 7, no. 6 (June 2021): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2021.E07309.
  12. Laksana, Priyo Dwi Hendra, Toto’ Bara Setiawan, and Susi Setiawani. “Proses Berpikir Siswa yang Mengikuti Ekstrakurikuler Bridge pada Penyelesaian Soal Cerita Teori Peluang Berdasarkan Ranah Kognitif Taksonomi Bloom Revisi.†KadikmA 8, no. 1 (2017): 172–82. https://doi.org/10.19184/kdma.v8i1.5279.
  13. Lubis, Maesaroh, and Nani Widiawati. “Integrasi Domain Afektif Taksonomi Bloom Dengan Pendidikan Spiritual Al-Ghazali (Telaah Kitab Ayyuhal Walad).†JURNAL EDUCATIVE: Journal of Educational Studies 5, no. 1 (2020): 41–56. https://doi.org/10.30983/educative.v5i1.3228.
  14. Mabrurrosi, Mabrurrosi. “Analisis Buku Ajar Bahasa Arab Karya Dr. D. Hidayat.†Al-Irfan: Journal of Arabic Literature and Islamic Studies 3, no. 2 (September 10, 2020): 237–57. https://doi.org/10.36835/al-irfan.v3i2.4016.
  15. Mahmudah, Yushi M. Bahasa Arab MTs Kelas IX. Jakarta: Direktorat KSKK Madrasah, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam, 2020.
  16. Mulyasa, E. Pengembangan Dan Imlementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2014.
  17. Prameswari, Laudria Nanda. “Analisis Kemampuan Baca Tulis Al-Qur’an Siswa MTs Dalam Perspektif Taksonomi Bloom.†Edudeena 3, no. 2 (2019): 69–78.
  18. Rahmawati, Nailur. “Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab: Menuju Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS).†In Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Bahasa Arab (KONASBARA), 149–54. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang, 2018. http://prosiding.arab-um.com/index.php/konasbara/article/view/265.
  19. Rahmi Nur Fauziah, Indah, Syihabudin Syihabudin, and Asep Sopian. “Analisis Kualitas Tes Bahasa Arab Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS).†LISANUNA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Arab dan Pembelajarannya 10, no. 1 (August 2020): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.22373/ls.v10i1.7805.
  20. Ramah, Sutri, and Miftahur Rohman. “Analisis Buku Ajar Bahasa Arab Madrasah Aliyah Kurikulum 2013.†Arabiyatuna: Jurnal Bahasa Arab 2, no. 2 (2018): 141–60. https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v2i2.552.
  21. Setyawan, Cahya Edi, Luthfi Abdul Basit, and Muhamad Fathoni. “Telaah Bahan Ajar Bahasa Arab ‘Ayo Fasih Berbahasa Arab’ Madrasah Aliyah Kelas XII Karya Hasan Saefullah (Tinjauan Materi Berdasarkan Teori Mackey).†In Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Bahasa Arab (KONASBARA), 225–34. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang, 2018. http://prosiding.arab-um.com/index.php/konasbara/article/view/273.
  22. Wachdah, Riham Lailatul. “Evaluasi Buku Ajar Bahasa Arab Kelas X Madrasah Aliyah: Pendekatan Saintifik Kurikulum 2013.†Al-Ma’rifah: Jurnal Budaya, Bahasa, Dan Sastra Arab 17, no. 1 (April 2020): 41–47. https://doi.org/10.21009/almakrifah.17.01.04.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 Alsina : Journal of Arabic Studies
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Alsina: Journal of Arabic Studies
Arabic Department, Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Kependidikan
UIN Walisongo, Semarang, Indonesia
Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka, Tambakaji, Kec. Ngaliyan, Kota Semarang, 50185
Central Java, Indonesia
Email: [email protected]

In collaboration with the Arabic Teachers Association of Indonesia (IMLA).

ISSN: 2622-6138 (Print)
ISSN: 2622-6146 (Online)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

apps