Hubungan Multiple Intelligences dengan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa dalam Pendidikan Biologi Abad 21

Firyal Aulia Ikbari  -  Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Pakuan, Indonesia
Rita Istiana*  -  Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Pakuan, Indonesia
Triasianingrum Triasianingrum  -  Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Pakuan, Indonesia
Ilmi Zajuli Ichsan  -  Pendidikan Kependudukan dan Lingkungan Hidup, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
Giry Marhento  -  Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia
Ahmad Ali  -  Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia
Wiwin Pramita Arif  -  Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia
Titin Titin  -  Pendidikan Biologi, Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/bioeduca.v3i1.6637
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara Multiple Intelligences dengan keterampilan proses sains, serta untuk mengetahui kekuatan hubungan, bentuk hubungan dan hubungan fungsionalnya. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan pada bulan Desember 2019 hingga Agustus 2020. Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI MIPA SMA Negeri 4 Cibinong tahun ajaran 2019/2020 dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 154 responden. Hasil analisis terdapat hubungan positif antara Multiple Intelligences dengan keterampilan proses sains, dengan persamaan regresi Ŷ = 27,228 + 0,128x. Koefisien korelasi (r) sebesar 0,409 sedangkan koefisien determinasi (r2) dihitung sebesar 16,7%.. keterampilan proses sains dapat dilihat dari Multiple Intelligences sedangkan 83,3% terbentuk dari faktor-faktor lain yang turut membentuk keterampilan proses sains siswa.

Keywords: multiple intelligences; keterampilan proses sains; siswa.

  1. Aisyah, A., Salehuddin, K., Aman, I., Yasin, R. ., & Mimiko, N. (2018). Eliciting elements of higher order thinking skills in the higher secondary examination question structure in japan and malaysia aznur. Proceedings of the Regional Conference on Science, Technology and Social Sciences (RCSTSS 2016), Rcstss 2016, 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0074-5
  2. Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2016). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082–1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21257
  3. Calado, F. M., Scharfenberg, F. J., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). Science-technology-society-environment issues in German and Portuguese biology textbooks: influenced of the socio-cultural context? International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 8(3), 266–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2018.1486051
  4. Camacho, D. J., & Legare, J. M. (2015). Opportunities to create active learning techniques in the classroom. Journal of Instructional Research, 4, 38–45.
  5. Chen, S. J., Chou, Y. C., Yen, H. Y., & Chao, Y. L. (2015). Investigating and structural modeling energy literacy of high school students in Taiwan. Energy Efficiency, 8(4), 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-015-9327-5
  6. Cirillo, M. C. (2014). Science and environmental stewardship. Global Bioethics, 25(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2014.922317
  7. Cukurova, M., & Bennett, J. (2018). Students’ knowledge acquisition and ability to apply knowledge into different science contexts in two different independent learning settings. Research in Science and Technological Education, 36(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1336709
  8. Demir, M. (2015). Third grade elementary students??? perception of science. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(2), 157–168.
  9. Garcia, L. C. (2015). Environmental science issues for higher-order thinking skills (hots) development: A case study in the Philippines. In Biology Education and Research in a Changing Planet (pp. 45–54). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-524-2
  10. Gardner, H. (2013). Multiple Inteligences; Kecerdasan Majemuk Teori Praktik Ter. Alexander Sindoro. Interaksara.
  11. Ichsan, I. Z., Iriani, E., & Hermawati, F. M. (2018). Peningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (Higher Order Thinking Skills) Pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar Melalui Video Berbasis Kasus Pencemaran Lingkungan. Edubiotik: Jurnal Pendidikan, Biologi Dan Terapan, 3(02), 12–18.
  12. Ichsan, I. Z., & Mulyani, S. W. W. (2018). Improving Students’ Motoric Skills Through Demonstration Method in Recycling Plastic Waste. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(2), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i2.5890
  13. Ichsan, I. Z., Rahmayanti, H., Purwanto, A., Sigit, D. V., Irwandani, I., Ali, A., Susilo, S., Kurniawan, E., & Rahman, M. M. (2020). COVID-19 outbreak on environment: Profile of islamic university students in HOTS-AEP-COVID-19 and PEB-COVID-19. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 5(1), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v5i1.6283
  14. Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Ali, A., Arif, W. P., & Prayitno, T. A. (2019). HOTS-AEP: Higher order thinking skills from elementary to master students in environmental learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 935–942. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.935
  15. Imamura, M. (2017). Beyond the limitations of environmental education in Japan. Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook, 11, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.7571/esjkyoiku.11.3
  16. Istiyono, E., Dwandaru, W. S. B., Setiawan, R., & Megawati, I. (2020). Developing of computerized adaptive testing to measure physics higher order thinking skills of senior high school students and its feasibility of use. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.91
  17. Kang, H., Windschitl, M., Stroupe, D., & Thompson, J. (2016). Designing, launching, and implementing high quality learning opportunities for students that advance scientific thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(9), 1316–1340. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21329
  18. Markaki, V. (2014). Environmental Education through Inquiry and Technology. Science Education International, 25(1), 86–92.
  19. Motallebzadeh, K., Ahmadi, F., & Hosseinnia, M. (2018). Relationship between 21st century skills, speaking and writing skills: A structural equation modelling approach. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11319a
  20. Nabilah, S., Anwar, Y., & Riyanto, R. (2019). Motoric mechanism with problem-based learning: Impact on students’ higher-order thinking skills. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v12n2.182-193
  21. Nam, C. W. (2017). The effects of digital storytelling on student achievement, social presence, and attitude in online collaborative learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1135173
  22. Perovic, S. (2014). Collaborative Research and Urban Educational Discourse in Contemporary Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4559–4563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.985
  23. Purwanto, A., Ichsan, I. Z., Nurfadhilah, N., Kurniawan, E., Ali, A., & Singh, C. K. S. (2020). ESBOR: Analysis Students HOTS for Develop Digital Technology in Environmental Learning. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(4), 3896–3904. http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/24556
  24. Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., Azwar, S. A., Purwandari, D. A., Pertiwi, N., Singh, C. K. S., & Gomes, P. W. P. (2020). DIFMOL: Indonesian students’ Hots and environmental education model during COVID-19. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 15(7).
  25. Razzaq, A., Ansari, N. Y., Razzaq, Z., & Awan, H. M. (2018). The Impact of Fashion Involvement and Pro-Environmental Attitude on Sustainable Clothing Consumption: The Moderating Role of Islamic Religiosity. SAGE Open, 8(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018774611
  26. Riyanti, Manurung, B., & Sudibyo, M. (2020). The Contribution of Multiple Intelligences Aspects on Science Process Skills of High School Students in Ecology Topic. 384(Aisteel), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-19.2019.4
  27. Samsudin, M. A., Haniza, N. H., Abdul-Talib, C., & Mhd Ibrahim, H. M. (2015). The Relationship between Multiple Intelligences with Preferred Science Teaching and Science Process Skills. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 9(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v9i1.1118
  28. Saputri, A. C., Sajidan, S., Rinanto, Y., Afandi, A., & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2019). Improving students’ critical thinking skills in cell-metabolism learning using stimulating higher order thinking skills model. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12122a
  29. Saputro, A. D., Irwanto, Sri Atun, & Wilujeng, I. (2019). The impact of problem solving instruction on academic achievement and science process skills among prospective elementary teachers. Elementary Education Online, 18(2), 496–507. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.561896
  30. Sawicki, V., & Wegener, D. T. (2018). Metacognitive Reflection as a Moderator of Attitude Strength Versus Attitude Bolstering: Implications for Attitude Similarity and Attraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217744196
  31. Şener, S., & Çokçalışkan, A. (2018). An Investigation between Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i2.2643
  32. Sharif, A., & Cho, S. (2015). 21st-century instructional designers: Bridging the perceptual gaps between identity, practice, impact and professional development. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(3), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i3.2176
  33. Sharpe, J., & Kelman, I. (2011). Improving the disaster-related component of secondary school geography education in England. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 20(4), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2011.619810
  34. Sindora. (2002). Multiple Intelligences: Kecerdasan majemuk dalam praktik. Interaksara.
  35. Trahan, M. H., Smith, K. S., & Talbot, T. B. (2019). Past, Present, and Future: Editorial on Virtual Reality Applications to Human Services. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 37(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2019.1587334
  36. Tsalas, N., Sodian, B., & Paulus, M. (2017). Correlates of metacognitive control in 10-year old children and adults. Metacognition and Learning, 12(3), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9168-4
  37. Udompong, L., Traiwichitkhun, D., & Wongwanich, S. (2014). Causal Model of Research Competency Via Scientific Literacy of Teacher and Student. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(2001), 1581–1586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.438
  38. Yacoubian, H. A. (2018). Scientific literacy for democratic decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 40(3), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1420266.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 Bioeduca: Journal of Biology Education
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Bioeduca: Journal of Biology Education
Published by Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Science and Technology UIN Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia
Jl Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III Ngaliyan Semarang 50185
Phone: +62 812-2359-1990
Website: https://journal.walisongo.ac.id/index.php/BIOEDUCA/index
Email: [email protected]

ISSN: 2714-8009 (Print)
ISSN: 2715-7490 (Online)


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

apps