University Students’ Preferable Types of Teacher Humor in English Classes

Pham Trut Thuy  -  Nam Can Tho University, Viet Nam
Le Thanh Thao*    -  Can Tho University, Viet Nam

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/vjv10i29096

The current study aimed to explore what types of teacher humor EFL students prefer in their classes. The study was designed as a mixed-method approach, using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews to collect data in two different Vietnamese universities. One hundred fifty-eight university students responded to the survey, and eight out of them were recruited as the participants for the interviews. The study results revealed that the types of jokes (M=4.41), riddles (M=4.08), and language play (M=4.15) were most favored. Besides, the participants' demographic information, including their gender and majors, affected their preferable types of teacher humor. Specifically, males showed more positive attitudes towards teacher humor than their counterparts. In terms of students’ majors, there were differences between non-English majors and English-majored students’ perceptions of irony, teasing, language play, visual and physical humor. Regarding the students’ positive attitudes towards teacher humor, EFL teachers should learn more about valuable strategies for using teacher humor in their classes due to the fact that they do not need to have a sense of humor to use it effectively.

Keywords: teacher’s humor; EFL students’ perceptions; forms of humor; the Mekong Delta of Vietnam

  1. AbdAli, A., Ashur, N., Ghazi, L., & Muslim, A. (2016). Measuring Students' Attitudes towards Teachers' Use of Humour during Lessons: A Questionnaire Study. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(35), 52-59.
  2. Apte, M. L. (1985). Humor and Laughter: An Anthropological Approach. Cornell University Press.
  3. Baringer, D. K., & McCroskey, J. C. (2000). Immediacy in The Classroom: Student Immediacy. Communication Education, 49(2), 178-186.
  4. Bekelja Wanzer, M., Bainbridge Frymier, A., Wojtaszczyk, A. M., & Smith, T. (2006). Appropriate and Inappropriate Uses of Humor by Teachers. Communication Education, 55(2), 178-196.
  5. Bonacchi, S. (2018). Verbal Aggression. In Handbuch Pragmatik (pp. 439-447). JB Metzler, Stuttgart.
  6. Belz, J. A. (2002). Second Language Play as a Representation of the Multicompetent Self in Foreign Language Study. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 1(1), 13-39.
  7. Boxer, D., & Cortés-Conde, F. (1997). From Bonding to Biting: Conversational Joking and Identity Display. Journal of Pragmatics, 27(3), 275-294.
  8. Colston, H. L., & O’Brien, J. (2000). Contrast of Kind Versus Contrast of Magnitude: The Pragmatic Accomplishment of Irony and Hyperbole. Discourse Processes, 30(2), 179–199.
  9. Curnow, S. J., Falciani, F., Durrani, O. M., Cheung, C. G., Ross, E. J., Wloka, K., Rauz, S., Wallace, G. R., Salmon, M., & Murray, P. I. (2005). Multiplex Bead Immunoassay Analysis of Aqueous Humor Reveals Distinct Cytokine Profiles in Uveitis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 46(11), 4251-4259.
  10. Dynel, M. (2009). Beyond A Joke: Types of Conversational Humour. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(5), 1284-1299.
  11. Englert, L. M. (2010). Learning with Laughter: Using Humor in The Nursing Classroom. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(1), 48-49.
  12. Fadel, S. A., & Al-Bargi, A. (2018). The Use of Humour in EFL Classrooms: Comparative Conversational Analysis Case Study. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 9(2), 262-282.
  13. Fki, N. (2021). Investigating Humor Integration in Tunisian Tertiary English Classes: A Comparative Study of Teachers’ and Learners’ Perceptions. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 12(3), 127-140.
  14. Goatly, A. (2012). Meaning and Humour. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Keltner, D., Capps, L., Kring, A. M., Young, R. C., & Heerey, E. A. (2001). Just Teasing: A Conceptual Analysis and Empirical Review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 229-248.
  16. Kim, S., & Park, S. H. (2020). Types of Verbal Humor in Elementary English Classes in Korea. English Teaching, 75(4), 101-132.
  17. Laguador, J. M. (2013). Developing Students’ Attitude Leading Towards a Life-Changing Career. Educational Research International, 1(3), 28-33.
  18. Lee, E. S. (2017). The Effects of Language Play Enhanced Activities (LPEA) in Novice EFL Classroom. ì˜Â어êµÂ육연구, 29(1), 21-42.
  19. Liu, K. W. (2012). Humor Styles, Self-Esteem and Subjective Happiness. Humor, 1, 21-41.
  20. Maranda, E. (1976). Riddles and Riddling: An Introduction. The Journal of American Folklore, 89(352), 127-137.
  21. Martin, R. A. (2010). Approaches to the Sense of Humor: A Historical Review. In The Sense of Humor (pp. 15-60). De Gruyter Mouton.
  22. McCall, R. B. (1995). On Definitions and Measures of Mastery Motivation. In R. H. MacTurk & G. A. Morgan (Eds.), Mastery Motivation: Origins, Conceptualizations, and Applications (pp. 273–292). Ablex Publishing.
  23. McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., & Bennett, V. E. (2006). The Relationships of Student End-Of-Class Motivation with Teacher Communication Behaviors and Instructional Outcomes. Communication Education, 55(4), 403-414.
  24. Moroschan, G., Hurd, P. L., & Nicoladis, E. (2009). Sex Differences in the Use of Indirect Aggression in Adult Canadians?. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(2), 146-159.
  25. Morrison, M. K. (2012). Using Humor to Maximize Living: Connecting with Humor. R&L Education.
  26. Neuliep, J. W. (1991). An Examination of the Content of High School Teachers' Humor in The Classroom and The Development of an Inductively Derived Taxonomy of Classroom Humor. Communication Education, 40(4), 343-355.
  27. Norrick, N. R. (2003). Issues in Conversational Joking. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1333-1359.
  28. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies-What Every Teacher Should Know. Heinle & Heinle.
  29. Petraki, E., & Nguyen, H. H. P. (2016). Do Asian EFL Teachers Use Humor in The Classroom? A Case Study of Vietnamese EFL University Teachers. System, 61, 98-109.
  30. Schmitz, J.R. (2002). Humor as a Pedagogical Tool in Foreign Language and Translation Courses. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 15(1), 89–113.
  31. Shade, R. A. (1996). License to Laugh: Humor in the Classroom. Libraries Unlimited.
  32. Staunton, T. V., Alvaro, E. M., Rosenberg, B. D., & Crano, W. D. (2020). Controlling Language and Irony: Reducing Threat and Increasing Positive Message Evaluations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 42(5), 369-386.
  33. Tarone, E. (2005). Fossilization, Social Context and Language Play. In Studies of Fossilization in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 157-172). Multilingual Matters.
  34. Technau, B. (2017). Aggression in Banter. In Verbale Aggression (pp. 89-122). De Gruyter.
  35. Torok, S. E., McMorris, R. F., & Lin, W. C. (2004). Is Humor an Appreciated Teaching Tool? Perceptions of Professors’ Teaching Styles and Use of Humor. College Teaching, 52(1), 14-20.
  36. Tuncay, H. (2007). Welcome to HELL: Humor in English Language Learning. Online Submission. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/
  37. Wanzer, M. B., Sparks, L., & Frymier, A. B. (2009). Humorous Communication Within the Lives of Older Adults: The Relationships Among Humor, Coping Efficacy, Age, and Life Satisfaction. Health Communication, 24(2), 128-136.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 Le Thanh Thao, Pham Trut Thuy, Pham Trut Thuy
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Vision: Journal of Language and Foreign Language Learning is indexed by

    

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Publisher
English Education Department,
Faculty of Education and Teacher Training,
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
Jl. Prof Hamka Ngaliyan Semarang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia

apps