From E-Government to Good Governance: Examining the Impact of Digitalization on Public Service Delivery in Indonesia

Mukhammad Akhmad Najich Alfayn*  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang – Indonesia, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/jpw.v4i2.14873
E-government merupakan pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dalam pemerintahan yang diharapkan dapat meningkatkan Good Governance. Implementasi e-government di Indonesia masih belum optimal dan masih menghadapi berbagai kendala. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi e-government di Indonesia dan pengaruhnya terhadap Good Governance. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif. Data dikumpulkan melalui studi pustaka dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi e-government di Indonesia belum sesuai dengan standar e-government dan belum mampu meningkatkan Good Governance secara signifikan. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi keberhasilan implementasi e-government di Indonesia adalah kualitas pelayanan publik, tingkat kepercayaan masyarakat, dan tingkat partisipasi masyarakat. Kendala yang dihadapi dalam implementasi e-government di Indonesia antara lain aksesibilitas, infrastruktur, kualitas pelayanan, dan integrasi sistem. Solusi yang dapat diterapkan untuk mengatasi kendala tersebut adalah peningkatan aksesibilitas, pengembangan infrastruktur, peningkatan kualitas pelayanan publik dan peningkatan partisipasi masyarakat dalam proses implementasi e-government
  1. Addo, A., & Senyo, P. K. (2021). Advancing E-governance for development: Digital identification and its link to socioeconomic inclusion. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 101568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101568
  2. Al-Besher, A., & Kumar, K. (2022). Use of artificial intelligence to enhance e-government services. Measurement: Sensors, 24(August), 100484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2022.100484
  3. Amrozi, Y., Aini, N., & Munadhiroh, Z. (2022). Peta Perkembangan E-Government Di Indonesia. JSI : Jurnal Sistem Informasi (E-Journal), 14(1), 2465–2472.
  4. Arief, V., & Yuardani, A. M. (2018). Efektivitas Penerapan Konsep E-Government Dalam Bentuk Aplikasi Elektronik Kelurahan Pada Kelurahan Sungaibangkong Kecamatan Pontianak Kota Kota Pontianak Provinsi Kalimantan Barat. TRANSFORMASI: Jurnal Manajemen Pemerintahan, 155–163. https://doi.org/10.33701/jt.v10i2.527
  5. Congo, S., & Choi, S. O. (2022). Evaluating Public Sector Employees’ Adoption of E-Governance and Its Impact on Organizational Performance in Angola. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315605
  6. del/HUMAS MENPANRB. (2020). Percepatan Transformasi Digital Pemerintahan Perlu Kesiapan SDM.
  7. Dhaoui, I. (2021). E-Government for Sustainable Development: Evidence from MENA Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2070–2099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00791-0
  8. Ferrari, A., Bacco, M., Gaber, K., Jedlitschka, A., Hess, S., Kaipainen, J., Koltsida, P., Toli, E., & Brunori, G. (2022). Drivers , barriers and impacts of digitalisation in rural areas from the viewpoint of experts. Information and Software Technology, 145(May 2021), 106816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106816
  9. Haase, S., & Buus, L. (2020). Translating government digitalisation policy in higher education institutions: the Danish case. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 15(4), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.1891-943X-2020-04-03
  10. Huđek, I., Tominc, P., & Širec, K. (2021). The impact of social and cultural norms, government programs and digitalization as entrepreneurial environment factors on job and career satisfaction of freelancers. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020779
  11. Idzi, F. M., & Gomes, R. C. (2022). Digital governance: government strategies that impact public services. Global Public Policy and Governance, 2(4), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00055-w
  12. jaya, S. (2013). Implementasi Dan Perkembangan E-Government di Indonesia. Jurnal Informatika Multimedia (JIM), 2(1), 37–52.
  13. Kurniawatik, A. T., & Khaerunnisa, T. (2021). Melek Information and Communications Technology ( ICT ) Pada Masyarakat Pedesaan Di Era Globalisasi. Cebong Jurnal, 1(1), 1–9.
  14. Liang, M., & Yueping, Z. (2018). Does e-government performance actually boost citizen use? Evidence from European countries. Public Management Review, 20(10), 1513–1532.
  15. Manullang, S. O., & Krisnadwipayana, U. (2021). Perubahan Sosial Masyarakat Pedesaan Di Era Digitalisasi. 4(1), 83–88.
  16. Martin-Shields, C. P., Camacho, S., Taborda, R., & Ruhe, C. (2021). Digitalization and e-government in the lives of urban migrants: Evidence from Bogotá. Policy and Internet, November, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.280
  17. Maulana, R. N. (2021). the Indonesian E-Government Initiatives: Development Stages of E-Government in Immigration Law Enforcement. Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Keimigrasian, 4(2), 87–109.
  18. Meiyanti, R., Utomo, B., Sensuse, D., & Wahyuni, R. (2018). Tantangan egovernment di negara berkembang: Tinjauan Literatur. Kelola Layanan TI Cyber (CITSM), 1–6.
  19. Mensah, I. K. (2020). Impact of Government Capacity and E-Government Performance on the Adoption of E-Government Services. Public Management Review, 303–311.
  20. Miskiewicz, R. (2022). Clean and Affordable Energy within Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Governance Digitalization. Energies, 15(24), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249571
  21. Nganje, F. (2020). Digitalising Democracy in SADC : Insights from 2019 Elections. 2020, 0–19.
  22. Oliveira, T. A., Oliver, M., & Ramalhinho, H. (2020). Challenges for connecting citizens and smart cities: ICT, e-governance and blockchain. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(7), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072926
  23. Ostasius, E., & Laukaitis, A. (2015). Reference model for e-government monitoring, evaluation and benchmarking. Engineering Economics, 26(3), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.26.3.8128
  24. Putra, R., Ardhiarisca, O., Wijayanti, R. R., & Pratiwi, B. Y. (2018). Evaluasi Perkembangan Dan Transparansi Laporan Keuangan. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, March, 156–166.
  25. Rybnikova, I., Vita JukneviÄÂienė1, Rita Toleikienė, N. L., Āboliņa, I., Reinholde, I., & Sillamäe, J. (2022). Digitalisation and e-leadership in local government before COVID-19: Results of an exploratory study. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 5(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.23762/fso
  26. Sopiandi, I., Susanti, D., & Wahyuno. (2022). Pengukuran Pemeringkatan Tata Kelola E-Government. INFOTECH Journal, 8–11.
  27. Umbach, G., & Tkalec, I. (2022a). Evaluating -governance through e-government: Practices and challenges of assessing the digitalisation of public governmental services. Evaluation and Program Planning, 93(June), 102118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102118
  28. Umbach, G., & Tkalec, I. (2022b). Evaluating -governance through e-government: Practices and challenges of assessing the digitalisation of public governmental services. Evaluation and Program Planning, 93(June), 102118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102118
  29. Yunita, N. P. (2018). Kondisi Terkini Perkembangan e-Government di Indonesia: Praktik Pemerintah dan Persepsi Publik. Universitas Islam Indonesia: Thesis.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 JPW (Jurnal Politik Walisongo)
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 
 
JPW (Jurnal Politik Walisongo)
Published by Department of Political Science
Faculty of Social and Political Science
Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang
Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III UIN Walisongo Semarang 
https://fisip.walisongo.ac.id/
Email: [email protected]

 
ISSN: 2503-3190 (p)
ISSN: 2503-3204 (e)
DOI: 10.21580/jpw

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 
 
View My Stats
Flag Counter
apps