Eksistensi ‘Illat dalam Mengukuhkan Teks Hadis-hadis Ru’yat al-HilÄÂl dan Fungsinya dalam Pengembangan Hukum Islam

Busyro Busyro*  -  Fakultas Syariah IAIN Bukittinggi, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2018.18.2.2352

ḤisÄÂb and ru’yat always be warm conversations when there is an early determination of Ramadhan and Shawwal. At that time, there are always two camps of scholars in reacting, the scholars who hold on to ḥisÄÂb (calculating the calendar) on one side, and on the other hand hold to ru’yat al-hilÄÂl (seeing the moon directly). This in turn often leads to time differences in setting the beginning of the month among Muslims. With the aim to unite the people in starting their worship, some scholars try to understand the texts of these traditions about ru’yat al-hilÄÂl by trying to find the 'illat (reason) of the laws of hadiths about ru’yat al-hilÄÂl. Their study of the 'illat law resulted in the conclusion that the ru’yat al-hilÄÂl is only a suitable means for the people that time and may not suitable for Muslims in this modern era. Therefore Muslims must use other wasÄ«lah (means) which further guarantee the realization of the purpose of law, namely modern astro­nomy. The conclusion of the law from the side of the discovery of ‘illat seems to be less suited to the purpose of ta'lÄ«l al-aḥkÄÂm, is to establish textual texts in addition to discovering the forms of development of the texts.

Keywords: ‘illat; ru’yat al-hilāl; ilmu ḥisāb

  1. Aini, Shofwatul. “Disparitas Antara Hisab dan Rukyat: Akar Perbedaan dan Kompleksitas Percabangannya.†Muslim Heritage 2, no. 1 (2017): 19–42. https://doi.org/10.21154/muslimheritage.v2i1.1044.
  2. Amin, Muhammad Faishol. “Metode Penentuan Awal Bulan Kamariyah Perspektif Empat Mazhab.†Hayula: Indonesian Journal of Multi¬disciplinary Islamic Studies 2, no. 1 (2018): 17–32. https://doi.org/ 10.21009/hayula.002.1.02.
  3. Amri, Rupi’i. “Hisab Hakiki Wujud al-Hilal sebagai Penentuan Awal Bulan Kamariah ‘Perspektif Historis dan Usul Fikih.’†Tarjih: Jurnal Tarjih dan Pengembangan Pemikiran Islam 13, no. 2 (2016): 125–40. https://jurnal.tarjih.or.id/index.php/tarjih/article/view/105.
  4. al-As’adi, Muhammad UbaidillÄÂh. al-MujÄ«z fÄ« Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Kairo: DÄÂr al SalÄÂm, 1990.
  5. Azhari, Susiknan. “Karakteristik Hubungan Muhammadiyah dan NU dalam Menggunakan Hisab dan Rukyat.†al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 44, no. 2 (2006): 453–85. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2006.442.453-485.
  6. al-BukhÄÂriy, Muḥammad ibn IsmÄÂ’īl AbÅ« ‘Abdillah. al-JÄÂmi’ al-Musnad al-á¹¢aḥīḥ al-Mukhtaá¹£ar min UmÅ«r RasÅ«lillÄÂh saw wa Sunanuh wa AyyÄÂmuh. Damaskus: DÄÂr Ṭawq al-NajÄÂh, 1422.
  7. Fazlurrahman. Membuka Pintu Ijtihad. Terj. Anas Mahyidin. Bandung: Pustaka, 1995.
  8. al-GhazÄÂlÄ«, AbÅ« ḤamÄ«d Muḥammad bin Aḥmad. al-Mustaá¹£fÄ min’ Ilm al-Uṣūl. Qum: Intiá¹£ÄÂrat DÄÂr al-DhakhÄÂ’ir, 1368.
  9. al-HarÄÂniy, Taqiy al-DÄ«n AbÅ« al-’AbbÄÂs Aḥmad ibn ’Abd al-ḤalÄ«m ibn Taimiyyah. Majmū’ al-FatÄÂwa. Madinah: Majma’ al-Mulk, 1995.
  10. Imron, Ali. “Pemaknaan Hadis-hadis Hisab-Rukyat Muhammadiyah dan Kontroversi yang Melingkupinya.†Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu al-Qur’an dan Hadis 15, no. 1 (2014): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14421/QH.2014.%X.
  11. KhalÄÂf, ’Abd al-WahhÄÂb. ‘Ilm Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Kairo: DÄÂr al-Qalam, 1978.
  12. KhÄ«n, MuṣṭafÄ Sa’īd. Athar al-IkhtilÄÂf fi al-QawÄÂ’id al-Uṣūliyyah fi IkhtilÄÂf al-FuqahÄÂ’. Kairo: Muassasah al RisÄÂlah, n.d.
  13. Musonnif, Ahmad. “Kritik Ideologis Metode Hisab dan Rukyat (Menyingkap Fungsi Ideologis Term Ummi dalam Penetapan Awal Bulan Islam).†Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam 3, no. 1 (2015): 19–40. https://doi.org/ 10.21274/ahkam.2015.3.1.19-40.
  14. al-Nadwi, ’Ali Aḥmad. al-QawÄÂ’id al-Fiqhiyyah. Damaskus: DÄÂr al-Qalam, 1994.
  15. al-NasÄÂ’i, AbÅ« Abd al-RaḥmÄÂn ibn Shu’ayb. Sunan al-NasÄÂ’iy. Mesir: MuṣṭafÄ al-BÄÂbi al Halabi wa AwlÄÂdih, 1964.
  16. al-NaisabÅ«riy, Muslim ibn Ḥajjâj AbÅ« YÅ«suf al-Qushayriy. al-Musnad al-á¹¢aḥīḥ al-Mukhtaá¹£ar bi Naql al-‘Adl IlÄ RasÅ«lillÄÂh saw. Beirut: DÄÂr al-IhyÄÂ’ al-TurÄÂth al-‘Arabiy, n.d.
  17. Nuruddin, Amiur. Ijtihad ’Umar Ibn al-Khaththab: Studi tentang Perubahan Hukum dalam Islam. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 1987.
  18. al-Qará¸ÂÄÂwi, YÅ«suf. Min Hadyi al-IslÄÂm FatÄÂwa Mu’ÄÂshirah. 3rd ed. Manṣūrah: DÄÂr al-WafÄÂ` al-ṬabÄÂ’ah wa al-Nashr wa al-TawzÄ«, 1994.
  19. al-Qará¸ÂÄÂwi, YÅ«suf. TaisÄ«r al-Fiqh Fi Dhau' al-Qur’ÄÂn wa al-Sunnah Fiqh al-á¹¢iyÄÂm. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-RisÄÂlah, 1993.
  20. al-Qurá¹­ubi, AbÅ« ’Umar YÅ«suf ibn ’AbdillÄÂh ibn Muḥammad ibn ’Abd al-Barr ibn ’Āṣim al-NamÄ«riy. JÄÂmi’ BayÄÂn al-’Ilm wa Faá¸Âlih. Saudi: DÄÂr Ibn al-Jauziy, 1994.
  21. Sado, Arino Bemi. “Analisis Fatwa MUI No. 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penetapan Awal Ramadhan, Syawal, dan Zulhijjah dengan Pendekatan Hermeneutika Schleiermacher.†Istinbath Jurnal Hukum Islam 14, no. 1 (2015): 64–84.
  22. Sha’bÄÂn, ZakÄ«y al-DÄ«n. Uṣūl al-Fiqh al-IslÄÂmÄ«y. 3rd ed. Kairo: DÄÂr al-Ta`lÄ«f, 1964.
  23. Sha’labi, Muḥammad Muṣṭafâ. Uṣūl al-Fiqh al-IslÄÂmÄ«y. Beirut: DÄÂr al-Nahá¸Âah al-Arabiyyah, 1986.
  24. al-ShÄÂá¹­ibiy, AbÅ« IsḥÄÂq al-ShÄÂá¹­ibiy IbrÄÂhÄ«m ibn MÅ«sÄ al-Lakhmi al-Gharnaá¹­i AbÅ« IsḥÄÂq. MuwÄÂfaqÄÂt fÄ« Uṣūl al-Sharī’ah. Mesir: Maktabah al-TijÄÂriyah al-KubrÄÂ, n.d.
  25. Siregar, Ahmad Yunan. “Metode Hisab dalam Rangka Menyelesaikan Perbedaan Puasa Arafah Antara Indonesia dengan Arab Saudi: Telaah Atas Pemikiran Profesor Syamsul Anwar.†At-Tafahum: Journal of Islamic Law 1, no. 1 (2017): 18–32. http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/ attafahum/article/view/665.
  26. al-Subki, Taj al-DÄ«n ‘Abd al-WahhÄÂb ibn ‘Ali. Jam’u al-JawÄÂmi’ fÄ« Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Beirut: DÄÂr al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, 2003.
  27. al-ṬūfÄ«, Najm al-DÄ«n. RisÄÂlah fÄ« Ri’ÄÂyah al-Maá¹£laḥah. Mesir: Maktabah al-Miá¹£riyyah li al-BanÄ«n, 1993.
  28. WafÄÂ’, Muḥammad. DilÄÂlÄÂt al-KitÄÂb al-Shar’i ‘alĠ’l Ḥukm (al-Maná¹­Å«q wa ’l-MafhÅ«m). Kairo: DÄÂr al-ṬabÄÂ’ah al Muḥammadiyyah, 1984.
  29. Wahid, Abdurarrahman. Hukum Islam di Indonesia: Pemikiran dan Praktek. Ed. Tjun Surjaman. Bandung: Rosdakarya, 1991.
  30. Yacob, Faisal Yahya, dan Faisal Ahmad Shah. “Metode Penentuan Awal Ramadhan dan Hari Raya Menurut Ulama Dayah Aceh.†Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura 16, no. 1 (2016): 9–31. https://doi.org/10.22373/ jiif.v16i1.741.
  31. Zahrah, Muḥammad AbÅ«. Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Beirut: DÄÂr al-Fikr al-‘Arabiy, n.d.
  32. ZaidÄÂn, ‘Abd al-KarÄ«m. al-WajÄ«z fi Uṣūl Al-Fiqh. BaghdÄÂd: DÄÂr al-Arabiyyah, 1977.
  33. Zaman, Qomarus. “Memahami Makna Hilal Menurut Tafsir al-Qur’an dan Sains.†Universum: Jurnal Keislaman dan Kebudayaan 9, no. 1 (2015): 103–15. http://jurnal.iainkediri.ac.id/index.php/universum/article/ view/78.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2018 Al-Ahkam
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher
Faculty of Sharia and Law Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
in collaboration with Indonesian Consortium Sharia Scholar (KSSI)
Jl Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III Ngaliyan Semarang 50185
Phone: 024 7601291
https://fsh.walisongo.ac.id/
email: [email protected]

 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View:  Visitor | Country  

 
apps