The Critique toward Uṣūl al-Fiqh Literacy of 1890–2023: An Offer for Development

Tholkhatul Khoir*    -  Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
Lathifah Munawaroh    -  Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
Zainudin bin Hassan    -  Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2024.34.1.19595

Critique of uṣūl al-fiqh literacy is very crucial. The scarcity of critique can lead to the risk of intellectual stagnation and an inability to address the legal needs of a constantly changing society, simultaneously causing a lack of resonance with reconstructive ideas. The study aims: 1) to explore evidence of the scarcity of studies criticizing uṣūl al-fiqh from 1890 to 2023; 2) to explain the factors influencing the scarcity of critical works, and 3) to propose steps for the reconstruction of uṣūl al-fiqh. The data sources for this article are works collected from web publishers, digital libraries, and search engines. The data obtained was mapped and analyzed, and its trends were recorded. This study finds that during the period 1890-2023, criticism was the rarest aspect in uṣūl al-fiqh literature. The factors causing the scarcity of critique vary and complement each other, involving scholarly elements, uṣūl al-fiqh factors, and surrounding policies. Although criticism of uṣūl al-fiqh is relatively rare, it does not mean there is no space for reconstruction. Through this study, readers can understand the recent developments in uṣūl al-fiqh and assess the extent to which criticism has been undertaken while reflecting on how reconstruction can be initiated once again.

Keywords: critique; policy; rare issue; reconstruction; uṣūl al-fiqh

  1. Adams, Mogamat Nasief. ‘A Postcolonial Critique of Modernist Approaches to MaqÄÂá¹£id al-SharÄ«`ah’. Master Thesis. University of Johannesburg, 2017.
  2. Ahmed, Rumee. ‘Islam and Literalism: Literal Meaning and Interpretation in Islamic Legal Theory. By Robert Gleave’. Journal of the American Oriental Society 136, no. 2 (2021): 458–460. https://doi.org/10.7817/jameroriesoci.136.2.458.
  3. Alhirtani, Nahla A. K. ‘Arabic Language Learning and Its Effect on Islamic Sciences Teaching a Case of a Premier University’. Review of European Studies 11, no. 1 (2019): 51–62. https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v11n1p51.
  4. Ali, Abdullah bin Hamid. ‘Scholarly Consensus: Ijma ‘: Between Use and Misuse’. Journal of Islamic Law and Culture 12, no. 2 (2010): 92–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528817x.2010.574391.
  5. Aliasa, Muhammad Nazir. ‘A Review of Maslahah Mursalah and Maqasid Shariah as Methods of Determining Islamic Legal Ruling’. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT) 12, no. 3 (2021): 2994–3001. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i3.1331.
  6. Alnaief, Moath, and Kotb Rissouni. ‘A Critical Analysis of the Claim that Absolute Juristic Interpretation (IjtihÄÂd) has Ended’. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 12, no. 2 (2022): 28–40. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.122.03.
  7. al-‘AlwÄÂnÄ«, ṬÄÂhÄ JÄÂbir. ‘Muqaddimah’. In Naẓariyyah al-MaqÄÂá¹£id ‘ind al-ImÄÂm Muhammad al-ṬÄÂhir Ibn ĀshÅ«r, 6–15. Virginia: International Institute of Islamic Thought, 1963.
  8. Amrin, Amrin, Suciyani Suciyani, and Nurrahmaniah Nurrahmaniah. ‘Reconstruction of Ali Yafie’s Thinking in the Field of Social Fiqh in the Development of Islamic Law (Critical Review)’. al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam 5, no. 1 (2023): 187–200. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2341.
  9. Amrin, Amrin, Supriyanto Supriyanto, and Suciyani Suciyani. ‘Hasan Hanafi’s Thoughts on the Authenticity of God’s Revelation’. Jurnal Indo-Islamika 12, no. 1 (2022): 35–48. https://doi.org/10.15408/jii.v12i1.22159.
  10. Anjum, Ovamir. ‘Islam and Literalism: Literal Meaning and Interpretation in Islamic Legal Theory, by Robert Gleave’. Journal of Islamic Studies 25, no. 3 (2014): 384–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etu046.
  11. Arif, Mahmud. ‘Fundamentals of Qur’anic Education Concept: A Critical Conceptualization with Special Reference to al-KilÄÂni’s Thought’. Global Journal al-Thaqafah 9, no. 2 (2019): 15–26. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJAT122019-2.
  12. Arifin, Zaenal. ‘Ushul Fiqh Sebagai Kerangka Berpikir Santri Milenial dalam Memecahkan Problematika Sosial Keagamaan’. Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD) 23, no. 2 (2023): 68–79. https://doi.org/10.61234/hd.v23i2.19.
  13. Asni, Fathullah al Haq Muhamad. ‘al-Syatibi Methodology Analysis in the Unification of Usul al-Fiqh Methods’. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 7, no. 7 (2017): 260–68. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i7/3093.
  14. Baroroh, Umdatul. ‘Understanding Methodology of Fiqh Sosial’. Santri: Journal of Pesantren and Fiqh Sosial 1, no. 1 (2020): 27–42. https://doi.org/10.35878/santri.v1i1.202.
  15. Baugh, Carolyn. ‘Robert Gleave, Islam and Literalism: Literal Meaning and Interpretation in Islamic Legal Theory (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012). pp. 256. $112.00 Cloth, $39.95 paper. ISBNs: 9780748625703, 9780748689866’. International Journal of Middle East Studies 48, no. 2 (2016): 407–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743816000258.
  16. Bedir, Murteza. ‘A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunni Usul al-Fiqh, by Wael B. Hallaq. 304 Pages, Bibliography, Index. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1997. $59.95 (Cloth) ISBN 0521-59027-2’. Middle East Studies Association Bulletin 33, no. 1 (1999): 83–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026318400038670.
  17. Beka, Rezart. ‘MaqÄÂá¹£id and the Renewal of Islamic Legal Theory in Ê¿Abdullah bin Bayyah’s Discourse’. American Journal of Islam and Society 38, no. 3–4 (2022): 103–45. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v38i3-4.2987.
  18. Belhaj, Abdessamad. ‘AbÅ« YaÊ¿rub al-MarzÅ«qÄ« and His Critique of the MaqÄÂá¹£id Theory’. Religions 14, no. 9 (2023): 1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14091212.
  19. Buba, T M. ‘Role of Maqasid al-Shariah as a Social Welfare Concept in the Interpretation of the Sources of Shari’ah’. Unilorin Shariah Journal 2, no. 1 (2014): 61–86.
  20. Carter, Michael. ‘The Study of Arabic’. Diogenes 58, no. 1–2 (2011): 106–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192112444981.
  21. Creswell, Robyn. ‘Is Arabic Untranslatable?’ Public Culture 28, no. 3 (2016): 447–56. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-3511490.
  22. Davis, Philip M. ‘Do Discounted Journal Access Programs Help Researchers in Subâ€ÂSaharan Africa? A Bibliometric Analysis’. Learned Publishing 24, no. 4 (2011): 287–98. https://doi.org/10.1087/20110406.
  23. Elalaoui, Mustapha Elhassani. ‘Fiqh Criticism According to the Malikis: Its Fields and Kinds’. International Journal of Specialized Islamic Studies 7, no. 4 (2022): 227–44. https://doi.org/10.31559/SIS2022.7.4.2.
  24. Faidi, Achmad. ‘Reconstruction of the National Legal System: Study the Implementation of the MaqÄÂsid al-Shari‘ah Theory’. al-’Adalah: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Islam 15, no. 2 (2019): 307–24. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v15i2.3387.
  25. Fajri, Pujangga Candrawijayaning. ‘Pendekatan Maqashid al-Syari’ah sebagai Pisau Analisis dalam Penelitian Hukum Islam’. Jurnal Penelitian Agama 23, no. 2 (2022): 247–62. https://doi.org/10.24090/jpa.v23i2.2022.pp247-262.
  26. Falak, Nabeela. ‘The Concept of Ijtihad, Its Legitimacy, Need and Importance in the Present Age’. Islamic Sciences 3, no. 1 (2020): 95–111. https://doi.org/10.52337/islsci.v3i1.18.
  27. Fitriani, Lailita, Luthfa Surya Anditya, Minahus Saniyyah, Nicken Nawang Sari, and Iffatin Nur. ‘Eksistensi dan Kehujjahan Urf sebagai Sumber Istimbath Hukum’. al-Hikmah 7, no. 2 (2022): 246. https://doi.org/10.30651/ah.v7i2.8088.
  28. Gaybullayev, Saidahmadxon. ‘The Beginning and Development of the Science “Usul al-Fiqh†In Mawarannahr’. The Light of Islam, 2021, 68–75. https://doi.org/10.47980/IIAU/2021/2/9.
  29. Gleave, Robert. ‘Wael B. Hallaq: A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunnī Usūl al-Fiqh. ix, 294 pp. Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1997. £35’. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 61, no. 3 (1998): 537–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00019388.
  30. al-Hafizh, Rasyid, Fachrul Rozy, and Zaim Rais. ‘Usul al-Fiqh: Its Epistemology, Purpose, and Use’. Diktum: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum 19, no. 1 (2021): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v19i1.1529.
  31. Hallaq, Wael B. ‘Was the Gate of Ijtihad Closed?’ International Journal of Middle East Studies 16, no. 1 (1984): 3–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020743800027598.
  32. Hallaq, Wael B. ‘Crises of Modernity: Toward a New Theory of Law?’ In A History of Islamic Legal Theories, edited by Wael B Hallaq, 207–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801266.007.
  33. Hallaq, Wael B. ‘Uṣūl al-Fiqh and ShÄÂfiʿī’s RisÄÂla Revisited’. Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies 19 (2019): 129–83. https://doi.org/10.5617/jais.7749.
  34. Hamed, Marwa, Mohammed Belyamani, Heba Abduljawad, and Zaid al-Barzinji. ‘Maqasid Research Methodology Challenges: A Survey Study’. Journal of Contemporary Maqasid Studies 1, no. 2 (2022): 83–104. https://doi.org/10.52100/jcms.v1i2.88.
  35. ḤanafÄ«, Ḥassan. Min al-Naṣṣ Ila al-WÄÂqi’: MuḥÄÂwalah Li-I’ÄÂdah BinÄÂʾi ’Ilmi Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Cairo: Markaz al-KitÄÂb li al-Nashr, 2004.
  36. Hapidin, Ahmad, Nanat Fatah Natsir, and Erni Haryanti. ‘The Challenge of Science in Islamic Education in Era 4.0’. Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah: Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora 8, no. 1 (2022): 41–57. https://doi.org/10.37567/alwatzikhoebillah.v8i1.995.
  37. Haq, Yahdi Dinul, Hafizah Muchtia, and Zia Alkausar Mukhlis. ‘Bid’ah in Concept of Maslahah Mursalah and Istihsan According to Imam Asy-Syathibi’. Juris (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 20, no. 2 (2021): 225–37. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v20i2.3352.
  38. Haque, Shahzaman. ‘Language Use and Islamic Practices in Multilingual Europe’. Signs and Society 8, no. 3 (2020): 401–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/710157.
  39. Haris, Abdul, and Nurfaika Nurfaika. ‘Rekonstruksi terhadap Design of Education, Character, and Practice’. Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah: Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora 8, no. 2 (2022): 82–95. https://doi.org/10.37567/alwatzikhoebillah.v8i2.1429.
  40. Hassan, Muhammad Asim Ul, Arshad Imran Rehmani, Ghulam Fareed, Muhammad Khursheed, Taswar Hussain, and Hafiz Muhammad Keifatullah. ‘The Historical and Critical Thinking of Usul-Ul- Fiqh and Its Evolution in Contemporary Era’. Central European Management Journal 31, no. 3 (2023): 820–28. https://doi.org/10.57030/23364890.cemj.31.2.88.
  41. Hefner, Robert W. ‘Ihsan Ethics and Political Revitalization: Appreciating Muqtedar Khan’s Islam and Good Governance’. International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2020. https://doi.org/10.47816/01.001.20.
  42. Hidayah, Nurul, and Fayruzah El-Faradis. ‘Efforts to Improve the Quality of al-Qur’an Reading and Writing Learning in al-Wathoniyah al-Islamiyah Sumenep al-Qur’an Education Park (TPQ)’. Indonesian Journal of Advanced Research 2, no. 5 (2023): 475–90. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijar.v2i5.4226.
  43. Ibn MÄÂlik, Ê»Abd al-Laá¹­Ä«f ibn Ê»Abd al-Ê»AzÄ«z. Sharḥ ManÄÂr al-AnwÄÂr fÄ« Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Libanon: DÄÂr al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1642.
  44. Imber, Colin. ‘Wael B. Hallaq, A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunni Usul al-Fiqh, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. pp. ix + 294. $98.95 (ISBN 0–860784568).’ Law and History Review 17, no. 3 (1999): 626–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/744391.
  45. Ingalls, Matthew B. ‘Islam and Literalism: Literal Meaning and Interpretation in Islamic Legal Theory, by Robert Gleave’. Review of Middle East Studies 47, no. 1 (2013): 71–73.
  46. Islam, Tazul. ‘Expansion of Maqasid Thought beyond Maqasid al-Shariah: Maqasid al-Quran as a New Paradigm’. Hamdard Islamicus 45, no. 4 (2022): 79–95. https://doi.org/10.57144/hi.v45i4.514.
  47. Jamaluddin, Jamaluddin. ‘Epistemologi Pembaharuan Usul Fikih Hasan Turabi’. Jurnal Mahkamah: Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Hukum Islam 2, no. 1 (2017): 59–76. https://doi.org/10.25217/jm.v2i1.78.
  48. Junaidy, Abdul Basith. ‘Revitalisasi Uṣūl Fiqh dalam Menghadapi Perubahan Sosial’. Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 3, no. 2 (2014): 43–59. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2009.3.2.43-59.
  49. Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. ‘Approaches to MaqÄÂá¹£id: Reductionism, Expansionism and Moderation (TafrÄ«á¹­, IfrÄÂá¹­, IÊ¿tidÄÂl)’. In Actualization (Taf’il) of the Higher Purposes (Maqasid) of Shariah, 6–9. Herndon: International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19prr6v.6.
  50. Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. ‘Human Intellect ('Aql) and Innate Human Nature (Fiá¹­rah) as Identifiers of MaqÄÂá¹£id’. In Actualization (Taf’il) of the Higher Purposes (Maqasid) of Shariah, 12–15. Herndon: International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19prr6v.8.
  51. Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. ‘IjtihÄÂd MaqÄÂá¹£idī’. In Actualization (Taf’il) of the Higher Purposes (Maqasid) of Shariah, 18–20. Herndon: International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19prr6v.10.
  52. Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. ‘Issues in the Legal Theory of Usul and Prospects for Reform’. Islamic Studies 40, no. 1 (2001): 5–23.
  53. Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. ‘Maqasid al-Shari’ah and Ijtihad as Instruments of Civilisational Renewal: A Methodological Perspective’. ICR Journal 2, no. 2 (2011): 245–71. https://doi.org/10.52282/icr.v2i2.647.
  54. Kamis, Mohd Sham, Muhammad Nazir Alias, Nik Abdul Rahim Nik Abdul Ghani, Norhayuza Mohamad, Aini Akmar Mohd Kasim, and Mohammad Firdaus Mohammad Hatta. ‘Readiness of Understanding the Arabic Term in Usul Fiqh’. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research 7, no. 1 (2020): 100–103. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.71.100.103.
  55. Key, Alexander. ‘Islam and Literalism: Literal Meaning and Interpretation in Islamic Legal Theory. By Robert Gleave. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013. pp. xii + 212. $39.95 (Paperback)’. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 74, no. 1 (2015): 179–84. https://doi.org/10.1086/679622.
  56. al-KhÄÂdimÄ«, NÅ«r al-DÄ«n MukhtÄÂr. al-MaqÄÂá¹£id al-Sharī’ah: ḌawÄÂbiá¹­uhÄÂ, TÄÂrÄ«khuhÄÂ, Taá¹­bÄ«qÄÂtuhÄÂ. RiyÄÂá¸Â: DÄÂr KunÅ«z Iá¹£biliyÄÂh, 2007.
  57. al-Khal, Samir. ‘Taha Jaber al-Alwani and His Innovative Project for the Science of Usul al-Fiqh’. Majalah al-Mi’yar 26, no. 2 (2022): 457–74. https://www.asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/182959.
  58. Koujah, Rami. ‘Divine Purposiveness and Its Implications in Legal Theory: The Interplay of KalÄÂm and Uṣūl al-Fiqh’. Islamic Law and Society 24, no. 3 (2017): 171–210. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-00243p01.
  59. Kurnaz, Serdar. ‘Eine Islamische Rechtsphilosophie? Herausforderungen, Problemfelder Und Lösungsvorschläge’. Rechtsphilosophie 9, no. 2 (2023): 128–50. https://doi.org/10.5771/2364-1355-2023-2-128.
  60. Latifah, Umi, Ida Nurlaeli, and Ulfi Zulfikar Faridhun. ‘Development of Classical Fiqh towards Contemporary: Relevance of Thought of Islamic Figures and Operational Transformation of Fiqh Products’. Santri: Journal of Pesantren and Fiqh Sosial 4, no. 1 (2023): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.35878/santri.v4i1.692.
  61. Lawrence, Bruce B . ‘Book Review: A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunnī Uṣul al-Fiqh by Wael B . Hallaq’. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 28, no. 2 (2001): 236–38.
  62. Lohlker, Rüdiger. ‘Fiqh Reconsidered: Indigenization and Universalization of Islamic Law in Indonesia’. Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society 7, no. 1 (2021): 188–208. https://doi.org/10.30965/23642807-bja10011.
  63. Madelung, Wilferd. ‘A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunnī Uṣūl al-Fiqh. By Wael B. Hallaq. pp. Ix, 294. Cambridge Etc., Cambridge University Press, 1997. £35.00’. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 8, no. 2 (1998): 267–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1356186300010130.
  64. Masudi, Idris. ‘Kontribusi Ushul Fiqh dalam Kajian Kritik Matn Hadith’. Refleksi 15, no. 1 (2018): 63–92. https://doi.org/10.15408/ref.v15i1.9706.
  65. Melchert, Christopher. ‘A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunnī Uṣūl al-Fiqh. By Wael B. Hallaq. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. Pp. Ix + 294. $59.’ Journal of Near Eastern Studies 62, no. 3 (2003): 220–22. https://doi.org/10.1086/380334.
  66. Melchert, Christopher. ‘A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunnī Uṣūl al-Fiqh. By Wael B. Hallaq. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. pp. ix + 294. $59.’ Journal of Near Eastern Studies 62, no. 3 (2003): 220–22. https://doi.org/10.1086/380334.
  67. Mergaliyev, Arman, Mehmet Asutay, Alija Avdukic, and Yusuf Karbhari. ‘Higher Ethical Objective (Maqasid al-Shari’ah) Augmented Framework for Islamic Banks: Assessing Ethical Performance and Exploring Its Determinants’. Journal of Business Ethics 170, no. 4 (2021): 797–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04331-4.
  68. Mu’adzah, Nadiyah. ‘Ushul Fiqh, Qaidah Fiqhiyyah, and Islamic Jurisprudence’. Journal of Islamic Economic Literatures 3, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.58968/jiel.v3i2.130.
  69. Muhammadin, Fajri Matahati, and Hanindito Danusatya. ‘De-Secularizing Legal Education in Indonesian Non-Islamic Law School: Examining the “Introduction to Jurisprudence†Textbooks on the “Norm Classification†Chapter’. Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam 1, no. 2 (2018): 135–58. https://doi.org/10.30659/jua.v1i2.2455.
  70. Muslim, Buhori, T. Wildan, Syarifuddin M. Saman, Nurchalis Sufyan, and Sitti Mawar. ‘The Arabic Language Contribution to the IstinbÄÂá¹­ in Islamic Law of Acehnese Scholars’. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 1 (2022): 224–43. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i1.11732.
  71. Muthalib, Salman Abdul. ‘Establishment of Islamic Law Based on Mukhtalif Hadiths: A Study on Ibn Qutaybah’s Thoughts’. Jurnal Ilmiah al-Mu’ashirah 20, no. 1 (2023): 219–29. https://doi.org/10.22373/jim.v20i1.17697.
  72. Muzakki, Ahmad. ‘Moderate Fiqh in The Perspective of Islamic Boarding School Students’. Syaikhuna: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pranata Islam 14, no. 1 (2023): 99–118. https://doi.org/10.58223/syaikhuna.v14i01.6400.
  73. Nasiri, Nasiri. ‘The Perfect Performance of Tariqat al-Mutakallimin According Fakhrudin al-Razi Perspective’. International Journal of Islamic Thought and Humanities 2, no. 1 (2023): 56–64. https://doi.org/10.54298/ijith.v2i1.61.
  74. Nasution, Adelina. ‘Narsisme Ulama: Dilema dan Posibilitas Rekonstruksi Ushul Fiqh Di Indonesia’. al-Ahkam 28, no. 2 (2018): 219–44. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2018.18.2.2308.
  75. Oktafiani, Vera, and Akhyar Hanif. ‘Konsep AmtsÄÂl al-Qur’ÄÂn NÅ«r al-DÄ«n ’Itr dalam Karyanya ‘UlÅ«m al-Qur’ÄÂn al-KarÄ«m’. Lathaif: Literasi Tafsir, Hadis dan Filologi 1, no. 1 (2022): 100–108. https://doi.org/10.31958/lathaif.v1i1.5749.
  76. Özket, Hasan. ‘In the Context of the Science of Usul al-Fiqh, Textual and Numerical Interpretation of Some Verses and Hadiths, with an Example of Social Groups’. Journal of Human Sciences 20, no. 4 (2023): 622–35. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v20i4.6415.
  77. Paharia, Naman, Muhammad Syafiq Mohd Pozi, and Adam Jatowt. ‘Change-Oriented Summarization of Temporal Scholarly Document Collections by Semantic Evolution Analysis’. IEEE Access 10 (2022): 76401–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3135051.
  78. Parker, Kimberly. ‘Further Reflections on Open Access’. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 87, no. 9 (2009): 732–732. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.09.070946.
  79. Pauzi, M., Darul Hipni, and Anwar M. Radiamoda. ‘The Importance of the Ijtihad Jama’i Method in Contemporary Fiqh Formulations’. al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 23, no. 1 (2023): 13–20. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v23i1.1322.
  80. Powers, David S. ‘A History of Islamic Legal Theories an Introduction to Sunni Usul al-Fiqh, by Wael B. Hallaq Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. 294 Pp. $59.95’. Edited by David S. Powers. Middle East Forum 8, no. 2 (1999). https://www.meforum.org/1293/a-history-of-islamic-legal-theories.
  81. Prihantoro, Hijrian Angga. ‘Hassan Hanafi and Islamic Legal Theory: From Phenomenology to Critique of the Slogan “Going Back to the Qur’an and Sunnaâ€Â’. Mazahib 20, no. 2 (2022): 193–224. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v20i2.3750.
  82. Rahim, Abdur. ‘A Historical Sketch of Mohammedan Jurisprudence’. Columbia Law Review 7, no. 2 (1907): 101–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/1109683.
  83. Rahman, Noor Naemah Abdul, Abdul Karim Ali, Rushdi Ramli, and Muhammad Safiri Ismail. ‘The Teaching and Learning of Usul Alfiqh in Public Universities in Malaysia: Reality and Challenges’. Jurnal Syariah 16, no. 3 (2008): 523–536. https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/JS/article/view/22755.
  84. Ramli, Mohd Hilmi. ‘al-TaftÄÂzÄÂnī’s Sources of Knowledge in Sharḥ al-Talwīḥ ‘alÄ al-Tawá¸Âīḥ li Matn al-Tanqīḥ fÄ« Uṣūl al-Fiqh’. Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam 22, no. 2 (2020): 155–204. https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol22no2.5.
  85. Rasool, Mohamed Saladin Abdul, Mohamed Azmil Mohd Yusof, and Siti Mariam Ali. ‘Wellbeing of the Society: A Maqasid al-Shari’ah Approach’. Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam, no. Sp. 1 (2020): 25–46. https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.sp2020no1.2.
  86. Repelita, Repelita, Nuzul Iskandar, and Mursal Mursal. ‘Uṣūl al-Fiqh Literacy for the Local Community: A Study on Shaykh Mukhtar Ambai’s Manuscript’. al-Ahkam 33, no. 2 (2023): 133–56. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2023.33.2.17045.
  87. Rohman, Izza. ‘Different Approaches to Sunni-Shi‘i Exegetical Differences: al-ṬabÄÂá¹­abÄÂ’ī, Hamka, and Shihab on Ahl al-Bayt’. Australian Journal of Islamic Studies 8, no. 1 (2023): 25–41. https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v8i1.555.
  88. Ruano, Delfina Serrano. ‘A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to the Sunni Usul al-Fiqh by Wael B. Hallaq’. Journal of Law and Religion 15, no. 1/2 (2000): 379–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/1051528.
  89. Sadari, S. ‘Qur’anic Studies: Ber-Ushul Fiqh dengan Maqashid Syariah sebagai Metode dalam Perspektif Yudian Wahyudi’. Shahih: Journal of Islamicate Multidisciplinary 3, no. 1 (2018): 47–61. https://doi.org/10.22515/shahih.v3i1.1103.
  90. Safian, Yasmin Hanani Mohd. ‘The Contribution of Yusuf Qaradawi to the Development of Fiqh’. Electronic Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law 4 (2016): 45–53. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-124518.
  91. Saleh, Walid A. ‘Rereading al-ṬabarÄ« through al-MÄÂturÄ«dÄ«: New Light on the Third Century Hijrī’. Journal of Qur’anic Studies 18, no. 2 (2016): 180–209. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2016.0242.
  92. Samatkhonovich, Gaybullaev Saidahmadkhon, Khushvaqov Makhmayusuf Ashurovich, and Abdupattaev Mumin Mirzo Murodjon Ugli. ‘The Entry and Development of the Science “Usul al-Fiqh†in Mawarounnahr’. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI) 12, no. 6 (2021): 6735–41. https://www.tojqi.net/index.php/journal/article/download/2817/1882/3127.
  93. Sandahl, Johan. ‘Opening up the Echo Chamber: Perspective Taking in Social Science Education’. Acta Didactica Norden 14, no. 4 (2020): 6. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.8350.
  94. Setia, Adi. ‘Freeing Maqasid and Maslaha from Surreptitious Utilitarianism’. Journal of Islamic Sciences 14, no. 2 (2016): 127–57. https://cis-ca.org/_media/pdf/2016/2/A_fmamfsu.pdf.
  95. Sh.A, Yovqochev. ‘On the Contribution of the Transoxiana (Mawarannahr) Peoples to the Islamic Sciences’. Minbar Islamic Studies 15, no. 2 (2022): 263–83. https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569.
  96. Shamsuddin, Salahuddin Mohd., and Siti Sara Binti Hj. Ahmad. ‘Modernization of Arab Linguistic Sciences in Modern Age’. preprints.org, 2018. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/201801.0197/v1.
  97. Shamsy, Ahmed El. ‘Book Review: Islam and Literalism: Literal Meaning and Interpretation in Islamic Legal Theory, Written by Robert Gleave’. Islamic Law and Society 22, no. 1–2 (2015): 148–52. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-02212p06.
  98. al-ShÄÂá¹­ibÄ«, IbrÄÂhÄ«m ibn MÅ«sÄ al-Lakhmi al-Gharnaá¹­i AbÅ« IsḥÄÂq. MuwÄÂfaqÄÂt fÄ« Uṣūl al-Sharī’ah. Cairo: Maktabah al-TijÄÂriyah al-KubrÄÂ, 2019.
  99. Snh, Mohammed Salmeen Abdullah Bin, Abdelali Bey Zekkoub, and Yousef Mohammed Abdo. ‘The Methodology of al-ImÄÂm JamÄÂl al-DÄ«n al-á¹¢afadī’s Use of Intrusion in the Interpretation of the Noble Qur’ÄÂn through His Book “Kashf al-AsrÄÂr Wa Hatku al-AstÄÂrâ€Â: An Analytical Critical Study’. MaÊ¿ÄÂlim al-QurʾÄÂn Wa al-Sunnah 19, no. 1 (2023): 46–68. https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v19i1.389.
  100. Soaita, Adriana Mihaela, Bilge Serin, and Jenny Preece. ‘A Methodological Quest for Systematic Literature Mapping’. International Journal of Housing Policy 20, no. 3 (2020): 320–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2019.1649040.
  101. Soufi, Youcef. ‘The Historiography of Sunni Usul al-Fiqh’. In The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Law, edited by Anver M Emon and Rumee Ahmed, 248–70. Oxford University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199679010.013.30.
  102. Staudt, Joseph. ‘Mandating Access: Assessing the NIH’s Public Access Policy’. Economic Policy 35, no. 102 (2020): 269–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiaa015.
  103. Strawson, John. ‘Revisiting Islamic Law: Marginal Notes from Colonial History’. Griffith Law Review 12, no. 2 (2003): 362–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2003.10854525.
  104. Syamsu, Pradi Khusufi, Achmad Satori Ismail, Sukron Kamil, and Muhbib Abdul Wahab. ‘Scrutinizing Integrative Learning in Arabic Instruction’. International Journal of Islamic Thought and Humanities 2, no. 1 (2023): 107–23. https://doi.org/10.54298/ijith.v2i1.78.
  105. Syaripudin, Ahmad, Sirajuddin Sirajuddin, Rustam Efendi, and Dedi Rochmad Hermawan Ali. ‘Pengaruh Pemahaman Bahasa Arab terhadap IstinbÄÂá¹­ Hukum Fikih’. Nukhbatul ’Ulum: Jurnal Bidang Kajian Islam 7, no. 2 (2021): 178–96. https://doi.org/10.36701/nukhbah.v7i2.411.
  106. Topal, Ahmet. ‘A Comparison of the Linguistic Categories of Muštarak and Muškil of the Ḥanafī Islamic Jurisprudence’. Şırnak Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, no. 31 (2023): 122–51. https://doi.org/10.35415/sirnakifd.1258792.
  107. Vishanoff, David R. ‘Islam and Literalism: Literal Meaning and Interpretation in Islamic Legal Theory, by Robert Gleave’. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 25, no. 4 (2014): 553–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2014.946823.
  108. Wimra, Zelfeni, Yasrul Huda, Mahlil Bunaiya, and Abdul Rahim Hakimi. ‘The Living Fiqh: Anatomy, Philosophical Formulation, and Scope of Study’. Juris (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 22, no. 1 (2023): 185. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v22i1.9491.
  109. Yakar, Sumeyra. ‘The Diachronic Analysis of Interactive Relation between ‘Urf and SÄ«ra ‘UqalÄÂiyya in the Ja‘farÄ« School of Law’. Kilis 7 December University Journal of Theology 7, no. 2 (2020): 719–744. https://doi.org/10.46353/k7auifd.793977.
  110. Yaman, Ahmet. ‘Fıkıh Usûlü İşlevini Tamamladı Mı?’ Marmara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 57, no. 57 (2019): 25–46. https://doi.org/10.15370/maruifd.679183.
  111. Yusdani. ‘Islamic Law and Contemporary Challenges from Fresh Ijtihad Point of View’. Jurnal Hukum Islam 20, no. 1 (2022): 101–24. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v20i1.5991.
  112. Yusuf, Moh. Asror. ‘Rethinking the Significance of Pesantren-Based Integrative Islamic Studies in the Faculty of Ushuluddin and Dakwah IAIN Kediri’. Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam 9, no. 2 (2019): 326–52. https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2019.9.2.326-351.
  113. Yusufoğlu, Kazim. ‘The Relationship between Justification and Judgement in Usul al-Fiqh’. Journal of the Near East Unıversıty Islamıc Research Center 8, no. 2 (2022): 167–81. https://doi.org/10.32955/neu.istem.2022.8.2.04.
  114. Zaprulkhan, Zaprulkhan. ‘MaqÄÂá¹£id al-Sharī’ah in the Contemporary Islamic Legal Discourse: Perspective of Jasser Auda’. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan 26, no. 2 (2018): 445–72. https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.26.2.3231.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Al-Ahkam
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher
Faculty of Sharia and Law Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
in collaboration with Indonesian Consortium Sharia Scholar (KSSI)
Jl Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III Ngaliyan Semarang 50185
Phone: 024 7601291
https://fsh.walisongo.ac.id/
email: [email protected]

 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View:  Visitor | Country  

 
apps