Guardianship Supervisory in Indonesia: A Comparative Analyzes of Baitul Mal Aceh and the Heirloom Board

Fatya Pramesta Cahyani  -  Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Muhammad Ya'kub Aiyub Kadir*    -  Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2023.33.2.17080

Guardianship supervisory has been a dilemma in the Indonesian legal system. The article assesses the practice of guardianship supervisory in Indonesia by comparing two prominent institutions, Baitul Mal Aceh (BMA) and the Heirloom Board (Balai Harta Peninggalan or BHP). The article focuses on understanding these organizations’ roles and responsibilities in preserving and managing guardianship supervisory. The article uses normative juridicial method to examine how Baitul Mal Aceh and BHP become guardian supervisors and their differences and similarities by reading norms, laws, journals, and the like. The article found that Baitul Mal Aceh has been unable to carry out its duties because of a lack of operational regulation (i.e., Governor’s Regulation) of Qanun Baitul Mal, while BHP only focuses on non-Muslim related issues. These two institutions work independently and cannot support each other. Dualism and lack of implementing regulations in guardianship institutions in Indonesia have posed a dilemma for ensuring proper guardianship over the personal and property of children who are not yet mature or not married under court decisions. The article sheds light on the limitations and complexity of guardianship and its surrounding issues in both institutions.

Keywords: Baitul Mal Aceh; children; guardianship; Heirloom Board

  1. Amiruddin, A., and Zainal Asikin. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018.
  2. Aryati, Rika, Hamzah Vensuri, and M. Febrianto. “Sejarah Berlakunya BW dan KUHPerdata di Indonesia.†Journal of Criminology and Justice 2, no. 1 (2022): 11–16. https://journal.fkpt.org/index.php/criminology/article/view/422/.
  3. Bhat, P. Ishwara. “Introduction: Legal Research Methodology, Purposes, and Footsteps.†In Idea and Methods of Legal Research, edited by P. Ishwara Bhat, 3–31. Oxford University Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199493098.003.0001.
  4. BHP Surabaya. “Sosialisasi Peran Balai Harta Peninggalan dalam Memberikan Perlindungan kepada Subjek Hukum berdasarkan Putusan dan/ Penetapan Pengadilan,†2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiSl-RLpCFQ.
  5. Devy, Soraya. Sistem Perwalian di Aceh: Pergumulan antara Hukum Islam, Hukum Positif, dan Praktek Masyarakat. Edited by K. Khairuddin. Banda Aceh: Sahifah, 2018.
  6. Dewi, Eva Cahyana. “Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Perwalian Anak Yatim Piatu yang Masih di bawah Umur.†Perspektif Hukum 20, no. 2 (2020): 328–46. https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v20i2.83.
  7. Ellermeijer, R.E.C., M.A. Robinson, A.F. Guevara, G. O’Hare, C.I.S. Veldhuizen, M. Wessells, R. Reis, and M.J.D. Jordans. “A Systematic Review of the Literature on Community-Level Child Protection in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.†Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies 18, no. 3 (2023): 309–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2023.2230889.
  8. Fan, Aidil. “Kedudukan Qanun dalam Pandangan Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.†Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam 6, no. 2 (2019): 19–42. https://doi.org/10.32505/politica.v6i2.2733.
  9. Hambali, Nurhidayah A. “Eksistensi Balai Harta Peninggalan dalam Penangan¬an Kasus Kewarisan Anak (Studi Kasus Nomor 501/Pdt.P/2-16/PA Mks).†[Undergraduate Thesis]. Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, 2017.
  10. Harahap, Nurhotia. “Perwalian Anak dalam Tinjauan Kompilasi Hukum Islam.†Jurnal El-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Pranata Sosial 4, no. 1 (2018): 116–29. https://doi.org/10.24952/el-qonuniy.v4i1.1831.
  11. Harwin, Judith, Bachar Alrouh, Lily Golding, Tricia McQuarrie, Karen Broadhurst, and Linda Cusworth. “The Contribution of Supervision Orders and Special Guardianship to Children’s Lives and Family Justice.†Nuffield Family Justice Observatory. London, 2019. https://www.nuffieldfjo.org.uk/resource/the-contribution-of-supervision-orders-and-special-guardianship-to-children-s-lives-and-family-justice.
  12. Heriyani, Endang, and Prihati Yuniarlin. “Fungsi BHP sebagai Wali Pengawas terhadap Anak di bawah Perwalian dalam Rangka Perlindungan Anak (Studi Kasus di BHP Semarang).†Jurnal Media Hukum 22, no. 2 (2015): 218–31. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2015.0057.218-231.
  13. Ishak, Ishak. “Perwalian Menurut Konsep Hukum Tertulis di Indonesia.†Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 19, no. 3 (2017): 571–90. https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/kanun/article/view/6875.
  14. Jauhari, Iman. “A Comparison of Child Protection Law between Indonesia and Malaysia.†Indonesian Journal of International Law 12, no. 1 (2014): 84–106. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol12.1.593.
  15. Kanwil Kemenkumham Jawa Timur. “Sosialisasikan Peran Balai Harta Peninggalan dalam Memberikan Perlindungan kepada Subjek Hukum.†jatim.kemenkumham.go.id, October 3, 2022. https://jatim.kemenkumham.go.id/pusat-informasi/artikel/19516-sosialisasikan-peran-balai-harta-peninggalan-dalam-memberikan-perlindungan-kepada-subjek-hukum.
  16. Mangara, Gerhard, and Tazqia Aulia al-Djufri. “Urgensi Pembaharuan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata di Indonesia.†Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 3, no. 4 (2022): 269–90. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v3i4.248.
  17. Mansur, Teuku Muttaqin. Hukum Adat Perkembangan dan Pembaruannya. Banda Aceh: Syiah Kuala University Press, 2018.
  18. Marsis, Edi. “Paradigma Baru Penetapan Perwalian Anak pada Pengadilan Agama Berbasis pada Perlindundungan Hak Anak.†Dirjen Badan Peradilan Agama, Mahkamah Agung, September 1, 2022. https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/publikasi/artikel/paradikma-baru-penetapan-perwalian-anak-pada-pengadilan-agama-berbasis-pada-perlindundungan-hak-anak.
  19. Nariawan, Yon. “Upaya Baitul Mal dalam Mensosialisasikan Wajib Zakat di Kabupaten Simeulue.†[Undergraduate Thesis]. Fakultas Dakwah dan Komunikasi, UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, 2016.
  20. Nizzar, Ananda Farhan, and Siti Malikhatun Badriyah. “Determination of Child Guardianship as a Requirement for Taking Guarantee of Property Rights Certificates.†Gema Wiralodra 14, no. 2 (2023): 995–1002. https://doi.org/10.31943/gw.v14i2.418.
  21. Pratiwi, Yulita Dwi. “Harmonisasi Perlindungan Harta Kekayaan Anak dalam Perwalian melalui Penguatan Peran Wali Pengawas.†Jurnal Suara Hukum 1, no. 1 (2019): 61–90. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v1n1.p61-90.
  22. Saputra, Hendra. “Pentingnya Baitul Mal Gampong dalam Pengelolaan Zakat.†Baitul Mal Aceh, April 21, 2022. https://baitulmal.acehprov.go.id/post/pentingnya-baitul-mal-gampong-dalam-pengelolaan-zakat.
  23. Shela Natasha. “Rekonstruksi Eksistensi Balai Harta Peninggalan sebagai Wali Pengawas melalui Harmonisasi Peraturan Hukum tentang Perwalian.†Majalah Hukum Nasional 49, no. 2 (2019): 131–60. https://doi.org/10.33331/mhn.v49i2.34.
  24. Simatupang, Taufik H. “Eksistensi dan Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Tugas Balai Harta Peninggalan di Indonesia.†Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 18, no. 3 (2018): 397–414. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.V18.397-414.
  25. Simatupang, Taufik Hidayat, Renny Supriyatni, Zainal Muttaqin, and Sonny Dewi Judiasih. “Paradox of State Authority in Supervision of Child Trust Assets in Indonesia.†Cogent Social Sciences 9, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2209992.
  26. Simatupang, Taufik Hidayat, Renny Supriyatni, Zainal Muttaqin, and Sonny Dewi Judiasih. “The Supervision of the Heritage Hall of the Children’s Asset Under Guardianship Towards the Legal System of Pancasila.†Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 24, no. 1s (2021). https://www.abacademies.org/articles/the-supervision-of-the-heritage-hall-of-the-childrens-asset-under-guardianship-towards-the-legal-system-of-pancasila-10317.html.
  27. Stark, Lindsay, Carolyn Bancroft, Sofyan Cholid, Amalia Sustikarini, and Adrianus Meliala. “A Qualitative Study of Community-Based Child Protection Mechanisms in Aceh, Indonesia.†Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies 7, no. 3 (2012): 228–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2012.663947.
  28. Subekti, R., and R. Tjitrosudibio. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata: Burgelijk Wetboek. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2006.
  29. Susanto Limbong, Ferry, and Aisyah Aisyah. “Legal Provisions in Indonesia Submitting a Guardianship Application to the Court After the Birth of Law Number 29 of 2019.†International Journal of Social Science, Education, Communication and Economics (SINOMICS Journal) 2, no. 3 (2023): 437–44. https://doi.org/10.54443/sj.v2i3.154.
  30. Syahputra, Akmaluddin. Perwalian Anak dalam Bingkai Hukum. Bandung: Citapustaka Media Perintis, 2014.
  31. UNICEF. Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989). https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/convention-text.
  32. Wahyudi, Firman. “Penerapan Prinsip Prudential dalam Perkara Perwalian Anak.†Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 31, no. 3 (2019): 368–83. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.44398.
  33. Wibowo, Ridho. “Eksistensi Balai Harta Peninggalan dalam Penanganan Kasus Kewarisan Anak (Studi Kasus Balai Harta Peninggalan Makassar).†[Undergraduate Thesis]. Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, 2015.
  34. Yani, Desi, and Tengku Erwinsyahbana. “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Harta Warisan Anak melalui Revitalisasi Balai Harta Peninggalan (BHP).†Jurnal Notarius 1, no. 1 (2022): 10–20. https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/notarius/article/view/13827.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Al-Ahkam
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher
Faculty of Sharia and Law Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
in collaboration with Indonesian Consortium Sharia Scholar (KSSI)
Jl Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III Ngaliyan Semarang 50185
Phone: 024 7601291
https://fsh.walisongo.ac.id/
email: [email protected]

 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View:  Visitor | Country  

 
apps