Waqf Land Certification Postponement for Place of Worship Due to the Obscurity of the Toll Road Expansion Project (Re-overview of Gustav Radbruch's Three Basic Legal Values Theory)

Zidney Ilma Fazaada Emha*  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Ana Silviana  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Musahadi Musahadi  -  (Scopus ID: 57209652941) Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2022.32.1.10745

Data from the Ministry of ATR/BPN shows that most waqf lands have legal certainty problems. This article wants to look at the case of delaying the certification of waqf land for the Baitussalam Mosque in Semarang City due to the unclear toll road expansion project. The discussion is related to Gustav Radbruch's theory of three fundamental legal values. This paper uses an empirical juridical approach with a qualitative descriptive-analytical research specification. Data were obtained through interviews with several key informants and supported by legal materials obtained from literature studies. The results showed that the delay in certifying the waqf land of Baitussalam Mosque at the Semarang City Land Office was due to legal concerns by residents if the land was affected by the expansion of the toll road project. This article proves that Gustav Radbruch's standard priority teachings, which prioritize justice over expediency and legal certainty, are irrelevant and not ideal. The case of Baitussalam Mosque places legal certainty through waqf land certification as a top priority that must be carried out. Thus, this study confirms the teaching of casuistic priority in the theory of modern legal goals.

Keywords: waqf land; basic legal values; Gustav Radbruch; standard priority; casuistic priority

  1. Adiyanta, F. C. Susila. “Hukum dan Studi Penelitian Empiris: Penggunaan Metode Survey sebagai Instrumen Penelitian Hukum Empiris.†Administrative Law and Governance Journal 2, no. 4 (November 8, 2019): 697–709. https://doi.org/10.14710/ALJ.V2I4.697-709.
  2. Akmal, Diya Ul. “Indonesian State of Law Is an Aspired Concept.†Nurani Hukum 4, no. 1 (June 14, 2021): 89. https://doi.org/10.51825/NHK.V4I1.9265.
  3. Alexy, Robert. “Gustav Radbruch’s Concept of Law.†In Law’s Ideal Dimension. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796831.001.0001.
  4. Ali, Achmad. Menguak Tabir Hukum. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2008.
  5. Ali, Zainuddin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009.
  6. Almahmudi, Nufi Mu’tamar. “Implikasi Instrumen Non-Zakat (Infaq, Sedekah, dan Wakaf) terhadap Perekonomian dalam Perkembangan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah.†Al-Huquq: Journal of Indonesian Islamic Economic Law 2, no. 1 (June 24, 2020): 30–47. https://doi.org/10.19105/ALHUQUQ.V2I1.3002.
  7. Alvat, Pradikta Andi. “Teori Tujuan Hukum.†Jurnal Bengkulu.com, January 29, 2021. https://www.jurnalbengkulu.com/teori-tujuan-hukum.
  8. Apriatin, Elia. “Problem dalam Penjagaan Aset Wakaf: Studi di Kecamatan Kemranjen Kabupaten Banyumas.†Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo, 2019. http://eprints.walisongo.ac.id/id/eprint/10287/.
  9. Apriliasari, Eki. “Problematika Sertifikasi Tanah Wakaf di Kelurahan Jemur Wonosari Kecamatan Wonocolo Kota Surabaya.†Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, 2021. http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/51096/.
  10. Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhamad Azhar. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.†Gema Keadilan 7, no. 1 (April 1, 2020): 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/GK.7.1.20-33.
  11. Budiman, Achmad Arief. “Akuntabilitas Lembaga Pengelola Wakaf’.†Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan 19, no. 1 (June 7, 2011): 75–102. https://doi.org/10.21580/WS.19.1.213.
  12. Eliana, Eliana, Reni Suryani, and Naib Naib. “Legalitas Kepemilikan Tanah.†Bhakti Hukum: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 1, no. 1 (2022). http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/JBH/article/view/17839.
  13. Erwin, Muhammad. Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2012.
  14. Fahruroji, Fahruroji, and Jaenal Arifin. “Pengembangan Harta Wakaf di Singapura.†Equilibrium 3, no. 1 (January 2015): 104–25. https://doi.org/10.21043/equilibrium.v3i1.1274.
  15. Fajar, Mukti, and Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Empiris & Normatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.
  16. Fanani, Ahmad Zaenal. “Berpikir Falsafati dalam Putusan Hakim.†Majalah Hukum Varia Peradilan. Jakarta, March 2011.
  17. Fauza, Nilna. “Rekonstruksi Pengelolaan Wakaf: Belajar Pengelolaan Wakaf dari Bangladesh dan Malaysia.†Universum 9, no. 2 (2015). http://repository.iainkediri.ac.id/378/.
  18. Fauzi, R. M.Qudsi, Meri Indri Hapsari, Sri Herianingrum, Sunan Fanani, and Tuti Kurnia. “The Challenges of Empowering Waqf Land in Indonesia: An Analytical Network Process Analysis.†International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-03-2021-0061/FULL/PDF.
  19. Fauzia, Amelia. Filantropi Islam: Sejarah dan Kontestasi Masyarakat Sipil dan Negara di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gading, 2016.
  20. Fuadi, Nasrul Fahmi Zaki. “Wakaf Sebagai Instrumen Ekonomi Pembangunan Islam.†Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam 9, no. 1 (July 31, 2018): 151–77. https://doi.org/10.21580/ECONOMICA.2018.9.1.2711.
  21. Fuller, Lon L. “Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart.†Harvard Law Review 71, no. 4 (February 1958): 630. https://doi.org/10.2307/1338226.
  22. Hoexter, Miriam. Endowments, Rulers, and Community: Waqf Al-Ḥaramayn in Ottoman Algiers. Edited by Ruud Peters and Bernard Weiss. Leiden: Brill, 1998.
  23. Huda, Miftahul. “Wakaf dan Kemandirian Pesantren dari Tebuireng Hingga Gontor.†Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 7, no. 1 (September 3, 2012): 211–31. https://doi.org/10.15642/ISLAMICA.2012.7.1.211-231.
  24. Huda, Miftahul, and Lukman Santoso. “Masjid Wakaf dan Transformasi Sosial Umat di Masjid Besar Imam Ulomo Sampung Ponorogo.†Tapis: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah 1, no. 01 (July 14, 2017): 84–109. https://doi.org/10.32332/TAPIS.V1I01.731.
  25. Hujriman. Hukum Perwakafan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2018.
  26. Kasdi, Abdurrohman. “Dinamika Pengelolaan Wakaf di Negara-Negara Muslim.†Ziswaf: Jurnal Zakat dan Wakaf 4, no. 1 (February 15, 2017): 73–86. https://doi.org/10.21043/ZISWAF.V4I1.3032.
  27. Khoerudin, Abdul Nasir. “Tujuan Dan Fungsi Wakaf Menurut Para Ulama dan Undang-Undang di Indonesia.†Tazkiya Jurnal Keislaman, Kemasyarakatan, & Kebudayaan 19, no. 2 (2018). http://jurnal.uinbanten.ac.id/index.php/tazkiya/article/view/1269.
  28. Medaline, Onny. “The Development of ‘Waqf’ on the ‘Ulayat’ Lands in West Sumatera, Indonesia.†Journal of Social Science Studies 5, no. 1 (July 13, 2017): 114. https://doi.org/10.5296/JSSS.V5I1.10419.
  29. Muhsan, Muhsan. “Wakaf di Saudi Arabia dan Mesir (Tinjauan Manajemen dan Terapan Wakaf Produktif).†Al-Majaalis: Jurnal Dirasat Islamiyah 1, no. 1 (November 20, 2013): 151–68. https://doi.org/10.37397/ALMAJAALIS.V1I1.11.
  30. Munir, Zainal Arifin. “Revitalisasi Manajemen Wakaf sebagai Penggerak Ekonomi Masyarakat.†De Jure Jurnal Hukum Dan Syariah 5, no. 2 (June 30, 2013): 162–71. https://doi.org/10.18860/J-FSH.V5I2.3007.
  31. Muslih, M. “Negara Hukum Indonesia dalam Perspektif Teori Hukum Gustav Radbruch (Tiga Nilai Dasar Hukum).†Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum 4, no. 1 (May 12, 2013): 130–52. https://doi.org/10.33087/LEGALITAS.V4I1.117.
  32. Nurhidayani, Muaidy Yasin, and Busaini. “Pengelolaan dan Pemanfaatan Wakaf Tanah dan Bangunan.†Maqdis: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Islam 2, no. 2 (2017): 163–76. http://journal.febi.uinib.ac.id/maqdis/article/view/126.
  33. Oktara, Loka. “Problematika Sertifikasi Tanah Wakaf di Kelurahan Pematang Gubernur Kecamatan Muara Bangkahulu Kota Bengkulu.†Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu, 2019. http://repository.iainbengkulu.ac.id/2707/.
  34. Sadeq, Abulhasan M. “Waqf, Perpetual Charity and Poverty Alleviation.†International Journal of Social Economics 29, no. 1 (2002): 135–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290210413038/FULL/XML.
  35. Saidah, Hany. “Program Percepatan Sertifikasi Tanah Wakaf untuk Pengamanan Aset Wakaf: Studi di Kantor Kementerian Agama Kota Batu.†Sakina: Journal of Family Studies 3, no. 2 (2019). http://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/jfs/article/view/272.
  36. Sam’ani, Sam’ani. “Paradigma Baru Perwakafan Pasca UU No. 41 Tahun 2004 tentang Wakaf.†Jurnal Hukum Islam 12, no. 1 (2009). http://e-journal.stain-pekalongan.ac.id/index.php/Hukum/article/view/321.
  37. Solihah, Cucu, and Tarmin Abdulghani. “Menuju Sertipikasi Wakaf Tanah Berbasis Sistem Teknologi di Kabupaten Cianjur.†Khidmatul Ummah: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat 2, no. 02 (January 12, 2022): 157–72. https://doi.org/10.30868/KHIDMATUL.V2I02.2076.
  38. Spaak, Torben. “Meta-Ethics and Legal Theory: The Case of Gustav Radbruch.†Law and Philosophy 28, no. 3 (March 2009): 261–90. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40284672.
  39. Sudirman, Sudirman, and Ramadhita Ramadhita. “Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat dalam Akselerasi Sertifikasi Tanah Wakaf di Kota Malang.†De Jure Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah 12, no. 1 (June 15, 2020): 35–50. https://doi.org/10.18860/J-FSH.V12I1.9087.
  40. Sumardjono, Maria S. W. Kebijakan Pertanahan Antara Regulasi & Implementasi. Jakarta: Kompas, 2001.
  41. Supraptiningsih, Umi. “Problematika Implementasi Sertifikasi Tanah Wakaf pada Masyarakat.†Nuansa: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Keagamaan Islam 9, no. 1 (January 5, 2012): 75–92. https://doi.org/10.19105/NUANSA.V9I1.22.
  42. Susanto, Vendy Yhulia. “Hingga September 2021, Baru 40% Tanah Wakaf yang Telah Bersertifikat.†Kontan.co.id, September 9, 2021. https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/hingga-september-2021-baru-40-tanah-wakaf-yang-telah-bersertifikat.
  43. Tim Penyusun Direktorat Pemberdayan Wakaf Dirjen Bimas Islam. Paradigma Baru Wakaf di Indonesia. Jakarta: Direktorat Pemberdayan Wakaf Dirjen Bimas Islam Kementrian Agama RI, 2008.
  44. Waskur, Waskur. “Pembuatan Akta Ikrar Wakaf di Kecamatan Rasau Jaya (Tinjauan Regulatif dan Implementatif).†Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum 14, no. 1 (January 18, 2022): 153. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v14i1.5797.
  45. Wijayanti, Winda. “Eksistensi Undang-Undang sebagai Produk Hukum dalam Pemenuhan Keadilan bagi Rakyat (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 50/PUU-X/2012).†Jurnal Konstitusi 10, no. 1 (2013). https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/100.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Al-Ahkam
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher
Faculty of Sharia and Law Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
in collaboration with Indonesian Consortium Sharia Scholar (KSSI)
Jl Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III Ngaliyan Semarang 50185
Phone: 024 7601291
https://fsh.walisongo.ac.id/
email: [email protected]

 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View:  Visitor | Country  

 
apps