Mentawaian and their land: local tenurial system, regional development, and cash economy

Amien Tohari*  -  Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
This article discusses the agrarian problems that will occur in Mentawai due to the encounter between the local tenure system and modern development. In many local development planning documents, the underlying development logic is to integrate social into the cash economy or market economy. Most of this modern development does not clearly describe the processes of social change that have taken place. In communities that still practice traditional economics, this kind of development has a very significant impact on changing social relations. This paper shows that development that changes the tenure system of a society, whether intentional or not, slowly or quickly, will also change the cultural system, political system, and social structure of society. The Mentawai people will learn how to live and survive in the new system. Some of them may be successful, and many of them will be eliminated. Besides, a shift in the management of natural resources, and land, which is different from the previous one will give rise to a wider agrarian conflict and transformation.

Keywords: and; tenurial system; local development; market economy; Mentawai

  1. Agustine Fuentes. 2002. Monkeys, Human, and Politics in the Mentawai Island; No Simple Solutions in a Complexs World. New York: Combridge University Press.
  2. Anonim. 2011. Social Change and Impact For Resources Management.
  3. Benda-Beckmann, Franz von, Keebet von Benda-Beckmann, and Melanie Wiber. 2006 Changing Properties of Property. Berghahn Books, New York and London
  4. Bruce, John W.. 1998. “Review of tenure terminology.†Tenure brief, no. 1 (July): 1-8.
  5. Darmanto dan Abidah B. Setyowati. 2013. Berebut Hutan Siberut, Orang Mentawai, Hutan, dan Politik Ekologi. Jakarta:KPG.
  6. de Soto, H. (2000). The Mystery of Capital; Why Capitalism Triumphs in The West and Fail Everywhere Else. New York: Basic Book.
  7. Erin O’Donnell Sills . 1998. Ecotourism as an Integrated Conservation and Development Strategy: Econometric Estimation of Demand by International Tourists and Impacts on Indigenous Households on Siberut Island, Indonesia. Dissertation Department of Environment in the Graduate School of Duke University.
  8. Gerard A. Persoon. 2003. Conflict over Trees and Waves in Siberut Island. Geogr. Ann., 85 B(4): 253-264.
  9. Hutagalung, Arie Sukanti. 1983. “Program Redistribusi Tanah di Indonesia; Suatu Sarana ke Arah Pemecahan Masalah Penguasaan Tanah dan Pemilikan Tanahâ€Â. Jakarta.
  10. Juniator Tulius. 2012. Family stories : oral tradition, memories of the past, and contemporary conflicts over land in Mentawai – Indonesia. Disertasi di Univeristas Leidan, tidak diterbitkan.
  11. Larson, Anne M. 2012. Tenure rights and access to forest; a training manual for research. Bogor:CIFOR.
  12. Lisa Johansen. 2008. “A Chance of Self reflection; Searching for Information among people of Mentawaiâ€Â, a thesis of master degree of Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of International Environment and Development Studies.
  13. Wiradi, G. (1984). “Pola penguasaan tanah dan Refoma Agrariaâ€Â. Dalam Dua Abad Penguasaan Tanah, Penyunting: Sediono M.P. Tjondronegoro dan Gunawan Wiradi. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 JPW (Jurnal Politik Walisongo)
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 
 
JPW (Jurnal Politik Walisongo)
Published by Department of Political Science
Faculty of Social and Political Science
Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang
Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III UIN Walisongo Semarang 
https://fisip.walisongo.ac.id/
Email: [email protected]

 
ISSN: 2503-3190 (p)
ISSN: 2503-3204 (e)
DOI: 10.21580/jpw

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 
 
View My Stats
Flag Counter
apps